Philip S. Wong
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Co-authors
- Howard ShevrinJames C. RootWilliam J. WilliamsEdward M. BernatScott C. BunceMarcel KinsbourneKevin B. MeehanHisham Hafez
- Topics
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers)Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (4 papers)Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (3 papers)
- Journals
- ACS Applied Materials & InterfacesPsychophysiologyThe Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
- Partner nations
- United StatesIreland
In The Last Decade
Philip S. Wong
22 papers receiving 401 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Cognitive Neuroscience 210
- Clinical Psychology 97
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 87
- Social Psychology 84
- Psychiatry and Mental health 55
Countries citing papers authored by Philip S. Wong
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip S. Wong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip S. Wong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip S. Wong more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip S. Wong
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip S. Wong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip S. Wong. The network helps show where Philip S. Wong may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip S. Wong
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip S. Wong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip S. Wong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip S. Wong. Philip S. Wong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 23 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 34 | |
| 14 | 52 | |
| 15 | Perceived benefits of eduPAD in enhancing learning | 1 |
| 16 | 23 | |
| 17 | 49 | |
| 18 | 85 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | 20 |
About Philip S. Wong
Philip S. Wong is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Surfaces, Coatings and Films, having authored 23 papers that have together received 420 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (4 papers) and Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (210 citations), General Psychology (10 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (87 citations). Philip S. Wong has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Howard Shevrin, James C. Root, William J. Williams, Edward M. Bernat, Scott C. Bunce, Marcel Kinsbourne, Kevin B. Meehan, Hisham Hafez, John A. Cegalis and Laura S. Boylan. Their work appears in journals such as ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, Psychophysiology and The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.