Jane C. Stout

12.8k total citations · 2 hit papers
134 papers, 6.5k citations indexed

About

Jane C. Stout is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science and Insect Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane C. Stout has authored 134 papers receiving a total of 6.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 97 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 62 papers in Plant Science and 54 papers in Insect Science. Recurrent topics in Jane C. Stout's work include Plant and animal studies (95 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (51 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (50 papers). Jane C. Stout is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (95 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (51 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (50 papers). Jane C. Stout collaborates with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and Germany. Jane C. Stout's co-authors include Dave Goulson, Dara A. Stanley, Erin Jo Tiedeken, Eileen F. Power, William O. H. Hughes, Carolina L. Morales, Ann Milbau, Blánaid White, Lara C. Derwent and Jens Dauber and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Nature Communications.

In The Last Decade

Jane C. Stout

129 papers receiving 6.2k citations

Hit Papers

Bees prefer foods containing neonicotinoid pesticides 2015 2026 2018 2022 2015 2017 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jane C. Stout Ireland 44 4.8k 3.1k 2.5k 1.9k 1.7k 134 6.5k
Lucas A. Garibaldi Argentina 43 5.6k 1.2× 4.1k 1.3× 2.9k 1.1× 2.1k 1.1× 1.3k 0.8× 185 8.2k
Catrin Westphal Germany 31 4.1k 0.9× 2.9k 0.9× 2.2k 0.9× 1.2k 0.7× 1.5k 0.9× 76 5.4k
Adam J. Vanbergen United Kingdom 32 3.9k 0.8× 3.2k 1.0× 1.6k 0.6× 1.8k 0.9× 1.3k 0.8× 63 5.6k
Maj Rundlöf Sweden 41 4.4k 0.9× 3.6k 1.2× 2.0k 0.8× 1.7k 0.9× 1.5k 0.9× 86 6.1k
Jason Gibbs Canada 35 4.1k 0.9× 2.8k 0.9× 1.8k 0.7× 1.6k 0.8× 1.1k 0.6× 102 4.6k
John S. Ascher United States 32 3.8k 0.8× 2.5k 0.8× 1.6k 0.6× 1.5k 0.8× 1.1k 0.6× 97 4.7k
Andrea Holzschuh Germany 37 5.1k 1.1× 3.3k 1.1× 2.8k 1.1× 1.4k 0.7× 2.7k 1.6× 58 7.2k
Andreas Müller Switzerland 33 4.3k 0.9× 2.7k 0.9× 2.2k 0.9× 1.7k 0.9× 1.3k 0.8× 109 5.7k
Bernard Vaissière France 28 8.7k 1.8× 6.8k 2.2× 3.7k 1.4× 3.9k 2.1× 1.5k 0.9× 68 10.2k
Mike Edwards United Kingdom 18 3.7k 0.8× 2.7k 0.8× 1.6k 0.7× 1.5k 0.8× 1.0k 0.6× 26 4.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Jane C. Stout

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane C. Stout's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane C. Stout with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane C. Stout more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane C. Stout

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane C. Stout. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane C. Stout. The network helps show where Jane C. Stout may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane C. Stout

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane C. Stout. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane C. Stout based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane C. Stout. Jane C. Stout is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Potts, Simon G., Deepa Senapathi, Matthias Albrecht, et al.. (2025). Beekeepers’ perceptions toward a new omics tool for monitoring bee health in Europe. PLoS ONE. 20(1). e0316609–e0316609. 1 indexed citations
2.
Obst, Carl, et al.. (2024). A decision methodology for site-level ecosystem accounting. Journal of Environmental Management. 366. 121814–121814. 3 indexed citations
3.
Stout, Jane C., et al.. (2024). Beekeeping improves shea pollination and fruit set in West African agroforestry parklands. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5(2). 2 indexed citations
4.
Russo, Laura, Fabian A. Ruedenauer, Maryse Vanderplanck, et al.. (2023). Fertilizer and herbicide alter nectar and pollen quality with consequences for pollinator floral choices. PeerJ. 11. e15452–e15452. 7 indexed citations
5.
Stout, Jane C., et al.. (2023). Signatures of Adaptation, Constraints, and Potential Redundancy in the Canonical Immune Genes of a Key Pollinator. Genome Biology and Evolution. 15(4). 3 indexed citations
6.
Phelan, Niamh, et al.. (2023). Protecting Farmland Pollinators: Whole Farm Scorecard - Experiences and Recommendations. Journal of Pollination Ecology. 34. 312–328.
7.
Stout, Jane C., et al.. (2023). Spatial analysis of cultural ecosystem services using data from social media: A guide to model selection for research and practice. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 8. 4 indexed citations
8.
Dirilgen, Tara, et al.. (2023). Responses in honeybee and bumblebee activity to changes in weather conditions. Oecologia. 201(3). 689–701. 25 indexed citations
9.
Murphy, James T., et al.. (2022). Globalisation and pollinators: Pollinator declines are an economic threat to global food systems. People and Nature. 4(3). 773–785. 44 indexed citations
10.
Stout, Jane C., et al.. (2022). Determinants of shea (Vitellaria paradoxa C.F. Gaertn.) fruit yield: A review of research approaches and current knowledge. Scientific African. 17. e01371–e01371. 4 indexed citations
11.
Collier, Marcus, et al.. (2021). Using ecosystem services to measure the degree to which a solution is nature-based. Ecosystem Services. 50. 101330–101330. 17 indexed citations
12.
Ross, Samuel R. P.‐J., Jean‐François Arnoldi, Michel Loreau, et al.. (2021). Universal scaling of robustness of ecosystem services to species loss. Nature Communications. 12(1). 5167–5167. 41 indexed citations
13.
Henry, Michael, et al.. (2021). Neonicotinoid residues in honey from urban and rural environments. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 28(22). 28179–28190. 24 indexed citations
14.
Williams, Christopher D., James Moran, D. ÓhUallacháin, et al.. (2020). Linear habitats across a range of farming intensities contribute differently to dipteran abundance and diversity. Insect Conservation and Diversity. 14(3). 335–347. 11 indexed citations
15.
Brown, Mark J. F., Lynn V. Dicks, Robert J. Paxton, et al.. (2016). A horizon scan of future threats and opportunities for pollinators and pollination. PeerJ. 4. e2249–e2249. 147 indexed citations
16.
Stout, Jane C., et al.. (2016). Breeding system and pollination ecology of a potentially invasive alien Clematis vitalba L. in Ireland. Journal of Plant Ecology. 11(1). 56–63. 15 indexed citations
17.
Zimmermann, Jesko, et al.. (2014). Assessing land-use change in Ireland using the Land-Parcel Identification System. EGUGA. 13017. 1 indexed citations
18.
Milillo, Sara R., Jane C. Stout, Irene Hanning, et al.. (2012). Listeria monocytogenes and hemolytic Listeria innocua in poultry. Poultry Science. 91(9). 2158–2163. 31 indexed citations
19.
Stout, Jane C.. (2011). PLANT INVASIONS: THEIR THREATS IN AN IRISH CONTEXT. Biology & Environment Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy. 111B(3). 135–141.
20.
Williamson, Mark, Jane C. Stout, Katharina Dehnen‐Schmutz, Ann Milbau, & Allan Hall. (2008). A provisional list of Irish archaeophytes.. Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick). 29(1). 30–35. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026