Beate Schrank

3.3k citations
91 papers · 2.0k indexed · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Beate Schrank

85 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Beate Schrank
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Applied Psychology 431
  • Clinical Psychology 873
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 469
  • Social Psychology 610
  • General Health Professions 661
Replace Elizabeth Carpenter–Song with:
Elizabeth Carpenter–Song United States
Dawn Edge United Kingdom
Shalini Lal Canada
Jerome Carson United Kingdom
Debra Srebnik United States
Jo Billings United Kingdom
Domenico Giacco United Kingdom
Fiona Lobban United Kingdom
Andrew C. H. Szeto Canada
Graeme McGrath United Kingdom
Beate Schrank relative to Elizabeth Carpenter–Song United States Elizabeth Carpenter–Song's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Elizabeth Carpenter–Song · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Beate Schrank

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beate Schrank's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beate Schrank with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beate Schrank more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beate Schrank

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beate Schrank. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beate Schrank. The network helps show where Beate Schrank may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Beate Schrank, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Beate Schrank Line = papers co-authored together Beate Schrank links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20241
3 20241
4 20242
5 20238
6 20231
7 20235
8 20230
9 20232
10 20222
11 20224
12 20216
13 20191
14 201720
15 201575
16 201428
17 201151
18 201067
19
[Depression and culture].
20094
20 2008153

About Beate Schrank

Beate Schrank is a scholar working on Medical Terminology, Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Social Psychology, having authored 91 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (13 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (11 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (10 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (10 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (10 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (10 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (9 papers) and Mental Health and Patient Involvement (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (431 citations), Clinical Psychology (873 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (469 citations), Social Psychology (610 citations) and General Health Professions (661 citations). Beate Schrank has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Mike Slade, Michaela Amering, Ingrid Sibitz, Giovanni Stanghellini, Victoria Bird, Annemarie Unger, Eva Katharina Masel, Herbert Watzke, Simon Riches and André Tylee. Their work appears in journals such as Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, European Psychiatry, Psycho-Oncology, Psychiatry Research and JMIR Serious Games.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026