Jan Van Bragt

676 citations
27 papers · 342 indexed · h-index 9
Topics
Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (6 papers)Chinese history and philosophy (4 papers)Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation (3 papers)
Partner nations
NetherlandsUnited States

In The Last Decade

Jan Van Bragt

21 papers receiving 258 citations

Peers

Jan Van Bragt
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Plant Science 135
  • Molecular Biology 58
  • Philosophy 54
  • Sociology and Political Science 48
  • Food Science 43
Replace Nigel Smith with:
Nigel Smith United States
B. Lowy United States
Léopold Sédar Senghor United States
Ranjit Chatterjee India
Andrew Dalby Russia
Peter T. Furst United States
Bernard R. Ortiz de Montellano United States
John Binns United States
Huey‐Ling Lin Taiwan
Alı A. Dönmez Türkiye
Jan Van Bragt relative to Nigel Smith United States Nigel Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Nigel Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jan Van Bragt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Van Bragt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Van Bragt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Van Bragt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Van Bragt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Van Bragt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Van Bragt. The network helps show where Jan Van Bragt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jan Van Bragt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jan Van Bragt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jan Van Bragt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jan Van Bragt. Jan Van Bragt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
Multiple religious belonging of the Japanese people
10
2
Soseki and Buddhism : Reflections on his later works. Part one
1
3 0
4
Nishida's thought
1
5
Buddhist spirituality : Indian, Southeast Asian, Tibetan, and early Chinese
2
6 0
7
Nishitani the Prophet
1
8 124
9 1
10 1
11 3
12 1
13 59
14 32
15 4
16
Effects of sterilization on components in nutrient media
16
17 17
18 8
19 2
20 3

About Jan Van Bragt

Jan Van Bragt is a scholar working on Religious studies, Cultural Studies and Plant Science, having authored 27 papers that have together received 342 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (6 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (4 papers) and Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (54 citations), Plant Science (135 citations) and Religious studies (17 citations). Jan Van Bragt has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Keiji Nishitani, David Edward Shaner, Ronald Pierik, Simon H. Wender, L.M. Rohrbaugh, H. J. den Hertog, David Dilworth, C.J. Keijzer and James W. Heisig. Their work appears in journals such as Phytochemistry, Scientia Horticulturae and Philosophy East and West.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026