John Binns
Impact in
- Plant Science top 10%
- Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Plant Virus Research Studies
- Plant Pathogens and Resistance
- Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
- Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
Papers in ⓘ
-
- African history and culture analysis 4
-
- Religion, Society, and Development 2
- Religion and Society Interactions 2
- Co-authors
- Steven D. Tanksley (1 shared paper)Lukas A. Mueller (1 shared paper)Robert Buels (1 shared paper)Nicolas L. Taylor (1 shared paper)Dani Zamir (1 shared paper)Mark H. Wright (1 shared paper)Robert N. M. Ahrens (1 shared paper)Evan Herbst (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church (2 papers)The Journal of Theological Studies (1 paper)PLANT PHYSIOLOGY (1 paper)The American Historical Review (1 paper)mSystems (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
John Binns
8 papers receiving 379 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Horticulture 7
- Plant Science 257
- Classics 11
- Molecular Biology 210
- Religious studies 14
Countries citing papers authored by John Binns
This map shows the geographic impact of John Binns's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Binns with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Binns more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Binns
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Binns. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Binns. The network helps show where John Binns may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside John Binns, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 343 | |
| 2 | An Introduction to the Christian Orthodox Churches | 2002 | 25 |
| 3 | 1996 | 24 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 4 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 8 | Russian Orthodox on the Eve of Revolution | 2005 | 1 |
| 9 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2001 | 0 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 13 | The T&T Clark History of Monasticism: The Eastern Tradition | 2019 | 0 |
| 14 | 2019 | 0 | |
| 15 | 1986 | 0 |
About John Binns
John Binns is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Molecular Biology, Religious studies and Archeology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 408 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include African history and culture analysis (4 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (2 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (2 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (2 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (2 papers), Christian Theology and Mission (2 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (2 papers) and Gut microbiota and health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (7 citations), Plant Science (257 citations), Classics (11 citations), Molecular Biology (210 citations) and Religious studies (14 citations). John Binns has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Steven D. Tanksley, Lukas A. Mueller, Robert Buels, Nicolas L. Taylor, Dani Zamir, Mark H. Wright, Robert N. M. Ahrens, Evan Herbst, Naama Menda and Chenwei Lin. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church, The Journal of Theological Studies, PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, The American Historical Review and mSystems.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.