Jan Duke

1.0k total citations · 1 hit paper
19 papers, 716 citations indexed

About

Jan Duke is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health Information Management and Issues, ethics and legal aspects. According to data from OpenAlex, Jan Duke has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 716 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in General Health Professions, 5 papers in Health Information Management and 4 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects. Recurrent topics in Jan Duke's work include Research in Social Sciences (3 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (3 papers) and Empathy and Medical Education (3 papers). Jan Duke is often cited by papers focused on Research in Social Sciences (3 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (3 papers) and Empathy and Medical Education (3 papers). Jan Duke collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and United States. Jan Duke's co-authors include Bernadette McSherry, Liz Beddoe, Cheryle Moss, Sarah Lake, Tana Wuliji, Barbara Murphy, Maralyn Foureur, Kenneth Walsh, Christa Fouché and Ritesh Shah and has published in prestigious journals such as Sociology of Health & Illness, Human Resources for Health and International Journal of Nursing Practice.

In The Last Decade

Jan Duke

19 papers receiving 657 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Journal of Law and Medicine

1999 513 citations Bernadette McSherry, Jan Duke profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jan Duke New Zealand	9	224	187	186	137	119	19	716
Melinda Hohman United States	18	340 1.5×	77 0.4×	274 1.5×	111 0.8×	150 1.3×	58	763
Liz Meerabeau United Kingdom	14	194 0.9×	84 0.4×	71 0.4×	131 1.0×	36 0.3×	32	576
Britta Wigginton Australia	19	245 1.1×	239 1.3×	111 0.6×	204 1.5×	112 0.9×	37	851
Valerie Leiter United States	12	114 0.5×	56 0.3×	306 1.6×	133 1.0×	69 0.6×	26	650
Elianne Riska Finland	15	269 1.2×	236 1.3×	103 0.6×	158 1.2×	25 0.2×	49	879
Anne Westhues Canada	14	199 0.9×	63 0.3×	257 1.4×	165 1.2×	84 0.7×	39	729
Lenna Nepomnyaschy United States	19	300 1.3×	112 0.6×	162 0.9×	574 4.2×	182 1.5×	44	1.2k
Arlene M. Katz United States	12	410 1.8×	188 1.0×	92 0.5×	88 0.6×	41 0.3×	19	732
Daniel Callahan United States	10	224 1.0×	184 1.0×	79 0.4×	64 0.5×	48 0.4×	36	632
Ronit D. Leichtentritt Israel	18	175 0.8×	234 1.3×	415 2.2×	276 2.0×	84 0.7×	59	852

Countries citing papers authored by Jan Duke

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Duke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Duke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Duke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Duke

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Duke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Duke. The network helps show where Jan Duke may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jan Duke

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jan Duke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jan Duke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jan Duke. Jan Duke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

19 of 19 papers shown

1.

Duke, Jan, et al.. (2016). Strengthening health professions regulation in Cambodia: a rapid assessment. Human Resources for Health. 14(1). 9–9. 27 indexed citations

2.

Bartley, Allen, et al.. (2016). Crossing borders: key features of migrant social workers in New Zealand. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work. 23(3). 16–30. 17 indexed citations

3.

Beddoe, Liz & Jan Duke. (2016). Continuing professional development of registered social workers in New Zealand. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work. 25(3). 35–49. 6 indexed citations

4.

Duke, Jan, et al.. (2014). Challenges in Coalition Unconventional Warfare: The Allied Campaign in Yugoslavia, 1941-1945. 1 indexed citations

5.

Duke, Jan, et al.. (2009). Becoming a Culturally Competent Health Practitioner in the Delivery of Culturally Safe Care: A Process Oriented Approach. 16(2). 40–49. 23 indexed citations

6.

Duke, Jan & Cheryle Moss. (2009). Re-visiting scholarly community engagement in the contemporary research assessment environments of Australasian universities. Contemporary Nurse. 32(1-2). 30–41. 9 indexed citations

7.

Duke, Jan, Karen McBride‐Henry, Kenneth Walsh, & Maralyn Foureur. (2009). The expectations of two New Zealand health services of the role of Clinical Chairs in nursing and midwifery. Contemporary Nurse. 31(2). 129–141. 8 indexed citations

8.

Lake, Sarah, Cheryle Moss, & Jan Duke. (2009). Nursing prioritization of the patient need for care: A tacit knowledge embedded in the clinical decision‐making literature. International Journal of Nursing Practice. 15(5). 376–388. 34 indexed citations

9.

Beddoe, Liz & Jan Duke. (2009). Registration in New Zealand social work. International Social Work. 52(6). 785–797. 29 indexed citations

10.

Duke, Jan, et al.. (2008). Senior nurses as patients: Narratives of special and meagre care. Contemporary Nurse. 31(1). 32–43. 10 indexed citations

11.

Walsh, Kenneth, Jan Duke, Maralyn Foureur, & Lesley Macdonald. (2007). Designing an effective evaluation plan: A tool for understanding and planning evaluations for complex nursing contexts. Contemporary Nurse. 25(1-2). 136–145. 8 indexed citations

12.

Foureur, Maralyn, et al.. (2007). Poetry: a reflective practice tool for nurses and midwives. 6(4). 203–212. 4 indexed citations

13.

Duke, Jan, et al.. (2007). Locating nursing classification schemes within health information strategies for New Zealand.. PubMed. 129(Pt 2). 1144–8. 1 indexed citations

14.

Hughes, Frances, et al.. (2006). Enhancing nursing leadership: Through policy, politics, and strategic alliances. Nurse Leader. 4(2). 24–27. 5 indexed citations

15.

Duke, Jan, et al.. (2006). Toward standardising nursing language in New Zealand.. PubMed. 122. 753–7. 1 indexed citations

16.

Duke, Jan. (2006). Reflections on Knowledge, Power, and Professional Privilege: A Healthcare Professional as a Healthcare Patient. International Journal for Human Caring. 10(1). 17–21. 2 indexed citations

17.

McSherry, Bernadette & Jan Duke. (1999). Journal of Law and Medicine. 513 indexed citations breakdown →

18.

Duke, Jan, et al.. (1998). Nursesʼ attitudes toward organ donation. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing. 17(5). 264–270. 15 indexed citations

19.

Bennett, Lydia & Jan Duke. (1995). Research note: Decision‐making processes, ethical dilemmas and models of care in HIV/AIDS health care provision. Sociology of Health & Illness. 17(1). 109–119. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact