Jamie M. Kramer
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Genetics top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Physiology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Brian E. StaveleyHans van BokhovenAnnette SchenckPhyllis C. ZeeFrancesca FaccoWilliam A. GrobmanKim HoTjitske Kleefstra
- Topics
- Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (10 papers)Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (9 papers)Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaNetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jamie M. Kramer
37 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- Molecular Biology 1.1k
- Genetics 600
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 333
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 313
- Physiology 294
Countries citing papers authored by Jamie M. Kramer
This map shows the geographic impact of Jamie M. Kramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jamie M. Kramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jamie M. Kramer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jamie M. Kramer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jamie M. Kramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jamie M. Kramer. The network helps show where Jamie M. Kramer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jamie M. Kramer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jamie M. Kramer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jamie M. Kramer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jamie M. Kramer. Jamie M. Kramer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 24 | |
| 4 | 28 | |
| 5 | 21 | |
| 6 | 48 | |
| 7 | 32 | |
| 8 | 30 | |
| 9 | 189 | |
| 10 | 65 | |
| 11 | 281 | |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | 141 | |
| 14 | 142 | |
| 15 | 36 | |
| 16 | 85 | |
| 17 | 291 | |
| 18 | 68 | |
| 19 | 184 | |
| 20 | Burden on the family: A study of relatives of schizophrenic patients | 1 |
About Jamie M. Kramer
Jamie M. Kramer is a scholar working on Aging, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Genetics, having authored 37 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (10 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (9 papers) and Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (197 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (176 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (313 citations). Jamie M. Kramer has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Brian E. Staveley, Hans van Bokhoven, Annette Schenck, Phyllis C. Zee, Francesca Facco, William A. Grobman, Kim Ho, Tjitske Kleefstra, Merel A.W. Oortveld and Marla B. Sokolowski. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Neuroscience and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.