Annette Schenck
- Aging top 2%
- Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms 6
- Genetics top 1%
- Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders 27
- Cell Biology top 2%
- Cellular transport and secretion 9
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 15
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Mitochondrial Function and Pathology 9
- Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways 7
-
- Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder 7
-
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research 6
- Co-authors
- Barbara BardoniJean‐Louis MandelJamie M. KramerAngela GiangrandeMerel A.W. OortveldClaudia BagniChristiane ZweierHans van Bokhoven
- Cited by
- AgingGeneticsCell Biology
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Annette Schenck
63 papers receiving 3.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
- Aging 150
- Genetics 1.4k
- Cell Biology 623
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 607
- Molecular Biology 2.3k
Countries citing papers authored by Annette Schenck
This map shows the geographic impact of Annette Schenck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annette Schenck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annette Schenck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Annette Schenck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annette Schenck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annette Schenck. The network helps show where Annette Schenck may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Annette Schenck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 24 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 189 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 281 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 141 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 244 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 85 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 27 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 251 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 59 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 32 | |
| 16 | 2003 | 255 | |
| 17 | 2003 | 26 | |
| 18 | 2001 | 66 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 291 | |
| 20 | 1999 | 107 |
About Annette Schenck
Annette Schenck is a scholar working on Aging, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Genetics, having authored 64 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (27 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (15 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (9 papers), Cellular transport and secretion (9 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (7 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (7 papers), Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (6 papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (150 citations), Genetics (1.4k citations) and Cell Biology (623 citations). Annette Schenck has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Barbara Bardoni, Jean‐Louis Mandel, Jamie M. Kramer, Angela Giangrande, Merel A.W. Oortveld, Claudia Bagni, Christiane Zweier, Hans van Bokhoven, Nicholas Harden and Monique van der Voet. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Cell and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.