James Testa

777 citations
15 papers · 586 indexed · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

James Testa

14 papers receiving 513 citations

Peers

James Testa
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 252
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 126
  • Computer Networks and Communications 197
  • Information Systems and Management 43
  • History and Philosophy of Science 24
Replace Piotr Fronczak with:
Piotr Fronczak Poland
Agata Fronczak Poland
Yougui Wang China
Young-Ho Eom South Korea
Zhesi Shen China
Diego F. M. Oliveira Brazil
R. Dean Malmgren United States
Daniel Hook United States
Francisco Grimaldo Spain
William Goffman United States
James Testa relative to Piotr Fronczak Poland Piotr Fronczak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Piotr Fronczak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Testa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Testa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Testa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Testa more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Testa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Testa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Testa. The network helps show where James Testa may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside James Testa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Testa Line = papers co-authored together James Testa links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 1982248
2 2009118
3
The Thomson Scientific journal selection process.
200667
4 199863
5 198337
6 198212
7 19858
8 20038
9 20037
10
The Thomson Scientific journal selection process
20086
11
La base de datos del ISI y su proceso de selección de revistas
20016
12 20093
13 20162
14 20021
15 19820

About James Testa

James Testa is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Computer Networks and Communications, Condensed Matter Physics, Political Science and International Relations and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 15 papers that have together received 586 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chaos control and synchronization (3 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (2 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (2 papers), Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (1 paper), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (1 paper), Artificial Intelligence in Games (1 paper), Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (1 paper) and Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (252 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (126 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (197 citations), Information Systems and Management (43 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (24 citations). James Testa has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include C. D. Jeffries, José María Herrera Pérez, G. A. Held, José Pérez, Alvin M. Despain and L. M. Falicov. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Serials Review, Physics Letters A, Epidemiology and Information Services & Use.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact