Daniel Hook

1.6k citations
31 papers · 966 indexed · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Hook

29 papers receiving 929 citations

Peers

Daniel Hook
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 378
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 131
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 464
  • Information Systems and Management 62
  • Health Informatics 10
Replace Ana Marı́a Cetto with:
Ana Marı́a Cetto Mexico
Ralph Kenna United Kingdom
Giacomo Livan United Kingdom
Peter Millington United Kingdom
Francisco Grimaldo Spain
Bertrand Berche France
L. Santamaría Germany
James Testa United States
Birgit Schmidt Germany
Markus Demleitner Germany
Daniel Hook relative to Ana Marı́a Cetto Mexico Ana Marı́a Cetto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Ana Marı́a Cetto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Hook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Hook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Hook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Hook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Hook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Hook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Hook. The network helps show where Daniel Hook may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Hook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Hook Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Hook links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018184
2 2018149
3 2007143
4 2020131
5 200865
6 201044
7 201932
8 202129
9 202428
10 200826
11 201117
12 201714
13 201413
14 200513
15 201412
16 201012
17 200711
18 20188
19 20196
20 20216

About Daniel Hook

Daniel Hook is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Information Systems, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Information Systems and Management, having authored 31 papers that have together received 966 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics (11 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (9 papers), Research Data Management Practices (5 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (4 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (3 papers), Algebraic and Geometric Analysis (2 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (2 papers) and Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (378 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (131 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (464 citations), Information Systems and Management (62 citations) and Health Informatics (10 citations). Daniel Hook has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Christian Herzog, Carl M. Bender, Simon Porter, Stacy Konkiel, Dorje C. Brody, Andreas Fring, H. F. Jones, Clare Dunning, Roberto Tateo and G. Lévai. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical, Physical Review Letters, Quantitative Science Studies, Annalen der Physik and Reviews of Modern Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact