Information Services & Use

810 papers and 3.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 810 papers published in Information Services & Use in the last decades have received a total of 3.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Information Services & Use usually cover Information Systems (276 papers), Information Systems and Management (96 papers) and Artificial Intelligence (81 papers) specifically the topics of Research Data Management Practices (82 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (69 papers) and Scientific Computing and Data Management (55 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Information Services & Use are Jan Velterop, Dirk Lewandowski, Julie Carpenter, Mark Ware, Cyril W. Cleverdon, Dirk Tunger, Paul Groth, Andrew Gibson, Michael E. D. Koenig and Rafael Ball.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Information Services & Use

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Information Services & Use. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Information Services & Use.

Countries where authors publish in Information Services & Use

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Information Services & Use. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Information Services & Use with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Information Services & Use more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025