James Rees
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Education top 10%
- Finance top 5%
- Co-authors
- Catherine DuroseLiz RichardsonJoanna RichardsonYasminah BeebeejaunCatherine NeedhamAdam WhitworthEleanor CarterAlan Harding
- Topics
- Healthcare innovation and challenges (11 papers)Community Development and Social Impact (11 papers)Mental Health and Patient Involvement (8 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaBiochemistryBMJ Open
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
James Rees
49 papers receiving 743 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- General Health Professions 281
- Sociology and Political Science 246
- Political Science and International Relations 158
- Education 143
- Finance 138
Countries citing papers authored by James Rees
This map shows the geographic impact of James Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Rees more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Rees
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Rees. The network helps show where James Rees may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Rees
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Rees. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Rees based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Rees. James Rees is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 44 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 23 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | Does sector matter? – understanding the experiences of providers in the work programme | 18 |
| 15 | 49 | |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | Towards Co-production in Research with Communities | 68 |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | Mapping city regions | 2 |
About James Rees
James Rees is a scholar working on Public Administration, Finance and Urban Studies, having authored 53 papers that have together received 803 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare innovation and challenges (11 papers), Community Development and Social Impact (11 papers) and Mental Health and Patient Involvement (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (107 citations), Urban Studies (91 citations) and Finance (138 citations). James Rees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Catherine Durose, Liz Richardson, Joanna Richardson, Yasminah Beebeejaun, Catherine Needham, Adam Whitworth, Eleanor Carter, Alan Harding, Robin Miller and Rebecca Taylor. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Biochemistry and BMJ Open.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.