James Rees

1.4k total citations
53 papers, 803 citations indexed

About

James Rees is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Finance. According to data from OpenAlex, James Rees has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 803 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in General Health Professions, 14 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 14 papers in Finance. Recurrent topics in James Rees's work include Healthcare innovation and challenges (11 papers), Community Development and Social Impact (11 papers) and Mental Health and Patient Involvement (8 papers). James Rees is often cited by papers focused on Healthcare innovation and challenges (11 papers), Community Development and Social Impact (11 papers) and Mental Health and Patient Involvement (8 papers). James Rees collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. James Rees's co-authors include Catherine Durose, Liz Richardson, Joanna Richardson, Yasminah Beebeejaun, Catherine Needham, Adam Whitworth, Eleanor Carter, Alan Harding, Robin Miller and Rebecca Taylor and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Biochemistry and BMJ Open.

In The Last Decade

James Rees

49 papers receiving 743 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
James Rees United Kingdom	16	281	246	158	143	138	53	803
Paul Spicker United Kingdom	17	209 0.7×	307 1.2×	271 1.7×	131 0.9×	95 0.7×	86	828
Richard Freeman United Kingdom	15	256 0.9×	220 0.9×	263 1.7×	142 1.0×	50 0.4×	30	821
Elizabeth Vidler United Kingdom	5	264 0.9×	234 1.0×	242 1.5×	242 1.7×	100 0.7×	8	756
Ingo Bode Germany	13	217 0.8×	331 1.3×	246 1.6×	139 1.0×	118 0.9×	80	728
Catherine Durose United Kingdom	19	294 1.0×	368 1.5×	291 1.8×	133 0.9×	104 0.8×	47	1.1k
Jean‐Michel Bonvin Switzerland	16	196 0.7×	373 1.5×	248 1.6×	104 0.7×	73 0.5×	71	676
John Shields Australia	17	224 0.8×	366 1.5×	141 0.9×	69 0.5×	81 0.6×	75	1.1k
Gary Craig United Kingdom	18	291 1.0×	466 1.9×	133 0.8×	180 1.3×	100 0.7×	64	923
Hilary Silver United States	16	210 0.7×	542 2.2×	191 1.2×	73 0.5×	118 0.9×	42	1.0k
Ralph da Costa Nuñez United States	9	283 1.0×	552 2.2×	99 0.6×	78 0.5×	198 1.4×	22	881

Countries citing papers authored by James Rees

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Rees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Rees

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Rees. The network helps show where James Rees may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Rees

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Rees. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Rees based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Rees. James Rees is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Rees, James, et al.. (2025). Robust Local Governance Responses in the Context of Turbulence: The Case of Collaborative and Co‐Created COVID‐19 Pandemic Responses in Two Local Authority Areas in England. Social Policy and Administration. 59(2). 350–359. 1 indexed citations

Rees, James, et al.. (2024). The Opportunities, Challenges, and Rewards of “Community Peer Research”: Reflections on Research Practice. Qualitative Inquiry. 31(3-4). 319–330. 1 indexed citations

Rees, James, et al.. (2022). Opening the ‘black box’: Organisational Adaptation and Resistance to institutional isomorphism in a prime-led employment services programme. Public Policy and Administration. 39(1). 106–124. 5 indexed citations

Sancino, Alessandro, et al.. (2022). The public sector and co‐creation in turbulent times: A systematic literature review on robust governance in the COVID‐19 emergency. Public Administration. 101(1). 53–70. 44 indexed citations

Rees, James, et al.. (2021). ‘You can’t Google everything’: the voluntary sector and the leadership of communities of place. Leadership. 18(1). 102–119. 9 indexed citations

Rees, James, et al.. (2021). Fun, lifelong relationships and a safer community: understanding collective leadership practice in a grassroots association. Voluntary Sector Review. 13(2). 207–225. 3 indexed citations

Newbigging, Karen, et al.. (2020). The contribution of the voluntary sector to mental health crisis care: a mixed-methods study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 8(29). 1–200. 23 indexed citations

Caulfield, Laura, et al.. (2020). Café Delphi: Hybridising ‘World Café’ and ‘Delphi Techniques’ for successful remote academic collaboration. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(1). 100095–100095. 6 indexed citations

Heins, Elke, James Rees, & Catherine Needham. (2019). Social Policy Review 31. Policy Press eBooks. 1 indexed citations

10.

Newbigging, Karen, John Mohan, James Rees, Jenny Harlock, & Alex Davis. (2017). Contribution of the voluntary sector to mental health crisis care in England: protocol for a multimethod study. BMJ Open. 7(11). e019238–e019238. 15 indexed citations

11.

Richardson, Liz, Kingsley Purdam, Sarah Cotterill, et al.. (2014). Responsible Citizens and Accountable Service Providers? Renegotiating the Contract between Citizen and State. Environment and Planning A Economy and Space. 46(7). 1716–1731. 9 indexed citations

12.

Miller, Robin & James Rees. (2014). Mental health commissioning: master or subject of change?. Mental Health Review Journal. 19(3). 145–155. 15 indexed citations

13.

Rees, James. (2013). Challenging governance theory: From networks to hegemony. Voluntary Sector Review. 4(1). 144–145. 1 indexed citations

14.

Rees, James, et al.. (2013). Does sector matter? – understanding the experiences of providers in the work programme. 18 indexed citations

15.

Rees, James. (2013). Public sector commissioning and the third sector: Old wine in new bottles?. Public Policy and Administration. 29(1). 45–63. 49 indexed citations

16.

Rees, James & Alex Lord. (2013). Making space: Putting politics back where it belongs in the construction of city regions in the North of England. Local Economy The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit. 28(7-8). 679–695. 20 indexed citations

17.

Rees, James. (2012). Tackling the PCI DSS challenges. Computer Fraud & Security. 2012(1). 15–17. 1 indexed citations

18.

Richardson, Joanna, Catherine Durose, Yasminah Beebeejaun, James Rees, & Liz Richardson. (2011). Towards Co-production in Research with Communities. DMU Open Research Archive (De Montfort University). 68 indexed citations

19.

Rees, James. (2010). Information security for small and medium-sized business. Computer Fraud & Security. 2010(9). 18–19. 6 indexed citations

20.

Robson, Brian, et al.. (2006). Mapping city regions. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact