Janie Percy‐Smith
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Education top 10%
- Public Administration top 5%
- Co-authors
- Robert LeachPaddy HillyardIan R. SandersonA. E. DarlowPeter WellsAnne M. ForemanGeraint HughesSurya Monro
- Topics
- Healthcare innovation and challenges (2 papers)Social Media and Politics (1 paper)Healthcare Policy and Management (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Janie Percy‐Smith
18 papers receiving 409 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Sociology and Political Science 195
- General Health Professions 150
- Political Science and International Relations 134
- Education 87
- Public Administration 85
Countries citing papers authored by Janie Percy‐Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Janie Percy‐Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janie Percy‐Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janie Percy‐Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Janie Percy‐Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janie Percy‐Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janie Percy‐Smith. The network helps show where Janie Percy‐Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janie Percy‐Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janie Percy‐Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janie Percy‐Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janie Percy‐Smith. Janie Percy‐Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Formative Evaluation of Community Strategies2004–2007 Final Report | 1 |
| 2 | 17 | |
| 3 | Community Profiling: A Practical Guide | 6 |
| 4 | 32 | |
| 5 | What Works in Strategic Partnerships for Children | 13 |
| 6 | 62 | |
| 7 | 105 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | Policy responses to social exclusion : towards inclusion? | 153 |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | Needs Assessments In Public Policy | 30 |
| 12 | Community Profiling: Auditing Social Needs | 21 |
| 13 | Understanding Local Needs | 16 |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | Justice: Means versus Freedom | 16 |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | The coercive state | 16 |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 6 |
About Janie Percy‐Smith
Janie Percy‐Smith is a scholar working on Public Administration, Finance and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 19 papers that have together received 526 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare innovation and challenges (2 papers), Social Media and Politics (1 paper) and Healthcare Policy and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (85 citations), Urban Studies (46 citations) and Library and Information Sciences (9 citations). Janie Percy‐Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert Leach, Paddy Hillyard, Ian R. Sanderson, A. E. Darlow, Peter Wells, Anne M. Foreman, Geraint Hughes and Surya Monro. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy & Public Affairs, Children & Society and Policy & Politics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.