Paul Spicker

1.7k citations
86 papers · 828 indexed · h-index 17

Paul Spicker

78 papers receiving 686 citations

Peers

Paul Spicker
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Public Administration 85
  • Political Science and International Relations 271
  • Finance 95
  • Urban Studies 50
  • General Health Professions 209
Replace Marjorie Mayo with:
Marjorie Mayo United Kingdom
Thomas B. Osborne United States
Simon Pemberton United Kingdom
Vera Schattan P. Coelho Brazil
Adam Habib South Africa
Gary Craig United Kingdom
Susan Himmelweit United Kingdom
Hilary Silver United States
Suzan Ilcan Canada
Bob Deacon United Kingdom
Paul Spicker relative to Marjorie Mayo United Kingdom Marjorie Mayo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Marjorie Mayo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Spicker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Spicker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Spicker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Spicker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Spicker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Spicker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Spicker. The network helps show where Paul Spicker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Paul Spicker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul Spicker Line = papers co-authored together Paul Spicker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20232
2 20205
3 20202
4 20201
5 20191
6 20190
7
Arguments for Welfare: The Welfare State and Social Policy
20174
8 201424
9 20148
10
Poverty and social security: concepts and principles.
20138
11 20130
12 20132
13 201241
14 20111
15 200613
16 20062
17 20068
18 19923
19
Social housing and the social services
19896
20
Principles of Social Welfare: An Introduction to Thinking About the Welfare State
198921

About Paul Spicker

Paul Spicker is a scholar working on Public Administration, Political Science and International Relations, Finance, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 86 papers that have together received 828 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Policy and Reform Studies (17 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (10 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (7 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (5 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (4 papers), Local Government Finance and Decentralization (4 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (85 citations), Political Science and International Relations (271 citations), Finance (95 citations), Urban Studies (50 citations) and General Health Professions (209 citations). Paul Spicker has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include David Gordon, Mike Rowe, Deborah Mabbett, Paul T. Seed, Adrián Sinfield, Gabriele Koehler, Paul Close, Richard M. Coughlin, Jochen Clasen and Irene Anderson. Their work appears in journals such as Social Policy and Administration, Journal of Applied Philosophy, Critical Social Policy, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Journal of Poverty and Social Justice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026