James Ranger‐Moore

6.0k citations
87 papers · 3.6k indexed · h-index 31

Impact in

Papers in

James Ranger‐Moore

87 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

James Ranger‐Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 185
  • Biochemistry 229
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 60
  • Biological Psychiatry 65
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 441
  • Oncology 550
Replace Marco Cascella with:
Marco Cascella Italy
Lori M. Minasian United States
Kendrith M. Rowland United States
Chien‐Huang Lin Taiwan
Yong Lin United States
Eunkyung Park South Korea
Jaime A. Yáñez Peru
Charles Y.F. Young United States
Tina Hernandez‐Boussard United States
Roger Harrison United Kingdom
James Ranger‐Moore relative to Marco Cascella Italy Marco Cascella's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30.5×
Marco Cascella · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Ranger‐Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Ranger‐Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Ranger‐Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Ranger‐Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Ranger‐Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Ranger‐Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Ranger‐Moore. The network helps show where James Ranger‐Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Ranger‐Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Ranger‐Moore Line = papers co-authored together James Ranger‐Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202116
2 2016107
3 20133
4 201213
5 201274
6 2012120
7 2010104
8 201047
9 201020
10 20095
11 200822
12 200721
13 200740
14 200731
15 20066
16 200425
17 200471
18 2004203
19 200313
20 200320

About James Ranger‐Moore

James Ranger‐Moore is a scholar working on Dermatology, Reproductive Medicine, Biochemistry, Oncology and Pharmacy, having authored 87 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (8 papers), Skin Protection and Aging (6 papers), Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (6 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (5 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (5 papers), Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes (4 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (4 papers) and Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (229 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (60 citations), Biological Psychiatry (65 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (441 citations) and Oncology (550 citations). James Ranger‐Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include David S. Alberts, Jana McPherson, James A. Crowell, Donna R. Vining, H.‐H. Sherry Chow, Iman A. Hakim, Wade M. Chew, Nathan J. Cherrington, Stephen Ferguson and Craig D. Fisher. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, Social Forces, Journal of Thoracic Oncology, Nicotine & Tobacco Research and Clinical Cancer Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026