Thomas C. Wright

20.8k total citations · 4 hit papers
161 papers, 13.0k citations indexed

About

Thomas C. Wright is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Surgery and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas C. Wright has authored 161 papers receiving a total of 13.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 132 papers in Epidemiology, 62 papers in Surgery and 35 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Thomas C. Wright's work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (129 papers), Genital Health and Disease (56 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (31 papers). Thomas C. Wright is often cited by papers focused on Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (129 papers), Genital Health and Disease (56 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (31 papers). Thomas C. Wright collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Canada. Thomas C. Wright's co-authors include Louise Kuhn, Sue J. Goldie, Mark H. Stoler, Edward J. Wilkinson, Diane Solomon, Catherine Behrens, L. Stewart Massad, Teresa L. Wright, Amy E. Pollack and Mark Spitzer and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet and JAMA.

In The Last Decade

Thomas C. Wright

158 papers receiving 12.4k citations

Hit Papers

2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women wit... 2005 2026 2012 2019 2007 2005 2015 2011 100 200 300 400 500

Peers

Thomas C. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
  • Epidemiology 10.9k
  • Surgery 4.4k
  • Oncology 3.4k
  • Microbiology 2.0k
  • Molecular Biology 1.5k
Replace Marc Arbyn with:
Marc Arbyn Belgium
Adriaan J. C. van den Brule Netherlands
Patti E. Gravitt United States
Jennifer S. Smith United States
Marc Arbyn Belgium
Nancy B. Kiviat United States
Laia Bruni Spain
Sílvia de Sanjosé Spain
Gary M. Clifford France
Xavier Castellsagué Spain
Marc Arbyn Belgium View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Thomas C. Wright
Thomas C. Wright · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Thomas C. Wright
Thomas C. Wright · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas C. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas C. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas C. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas C. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas C. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas C. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas C. Wright. The network helps show where Thomas C. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas C. Wright

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas C. Wright. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas C. Wright based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas C. Wright. Thomas C. Wright is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 39
2 1
3 2
4 36
5 20
6 14
7 87
8 65
9 20
10 419
11 391
12 25
13 23
14 15
15 53
16 54
17 58
18 19
19 46
20 79

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026