Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention

317.0k citations
6.9k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

  • Oncology top 1%
    • Cancer Risks and Factors
    • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
    • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
    • Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism

Papers in

    • Cancer Risks and Factors 546
    • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening 483
    • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection 394

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention

5.6k papers receiving 265.5k citations

Peers

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Comparison fields: 5 of 237
  • Oncology 78.2k
  • Cancer Research 38.9k
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 27.2k
  • Otorhinolaryngology 5.9k
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 32.1k
Replace Cancer Causes & Control with:
Cancer Causes & Control United States
BMC Cancer China
Cancers United States
Frontiers in Oncology China
Cancer Letters United States
Nature reviews. Immunology United States
International Journal of Oncology Japan
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Germany
European Journal of Cancer United Kingdom
Carcinogenesis United States
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention relative to Cancer Causes & Control United States Cancer Causes & Control's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.3×
Cancer Causes & Control · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

About Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention

The 6.9k papers published in Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention in the last decades have received a total of 317.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention usually cover Oncology (1.8k papers), Cancer Research (717 papers), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (573 papers), Genetics (649 papers) and Otorhinolaryngology (91 papers) specifically the topics of Cancer Risks and Factors (546 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (483 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (394 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (362 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (287 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (204 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (203 papers) and Smoking Behavior and Cessation (200 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention are Ahmedin Jemal, Elizabeth Ward, Christopher Paul Wild, Rebecca L. Siegel, Edward L. Giovannucci, Isabel dos‐Santos‐Silva, Lindsey A. Torre, Walter Churchill Willett, Valerie McCormack and Carol E. Desantis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact