Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English
20051.6k citationsJames R. Martin, Peter Robert Rupert WhiteAdelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide)profile →
Countries citing papers authored by James R. Martin
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of James R. Martin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James R. Martin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James R. Martin more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James R. Martin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James R. Martin. The network helps show where James R. Martin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James R. Martin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James R. Martin.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James R. Martin based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James R. Martin. James R. Martin is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Olgun, C. Guney, et al.. (2012). Energy Piles: Using Deep Foundations as Heat Exchangers. 13(2). 46–51.6 indexed citations
11.
Martin, James R., et al.. (2010). Duelo: cómo nos alineamos. Discurso & sociedad. 4(1). 120–150.1 indexed citations
12.
Martin, James R.. (2010). Vigilantism and informal social control in South Africa. Figshare. 23(3). 53–70.6 indexed citations
13.
Martin, James R. & Peter Robert Rupert White. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide).1648 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Caffarel, Michel, James R. Martin, & Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen. (2004). Language Typology: A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science. Series 4, Current issues in linguistic theory.84 indexed citations
15.
Martin, James R.. (2004). PROSODIC 'STRUCTURE': GRAMMAR FOR NEGOTIATION. Ilha do Desterro A Journal of English Language Literatures in English and Cultural Studies. 41–82.3 indexed citations
16.
Martin, James R.. (2004). Positive Discourse Analysis: Solidarity and Change. Scientia Insularum Revista de Ciencias Naturales en islas. 179–202.92 indexed citations
Martin, James R., et al.. (1990). A study of the effects of differential loadings on cofferdams. US Army Corps of Engineers: Engineer Research and Development Center (Knowledge Core).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.