Learning to write, reading to learn : genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney school
- Authors
- David RoseJames R. Martin
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w7790670 →Countries where authors are citing Learning to write, reading to learn : genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney school
This map shows the geographic impact of Learning to write, reading to learn : genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney school. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Learning to write, reading to learn : genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney school with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Learning to write, reading to learn : genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney school more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Learning to write, reading to learn : genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney school
This network shows the impact of Learning to write, reading to learn : genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney school. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Learning to write, reading to learn : genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney school.
About Learning to write, reading to learn : genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney school
This paper, published in 2012, received 321 indexed citations . Written by David Rose and James R. Martin covering the research area of Literature and Literary Theory, Linguistics and Language and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Literature and Literary Theory (243 citations), Language and Linguistics (158 citations) and Education (118 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w7790670.