Countries citing papers authored by James P. Shaver
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of James P. Shaver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James P. Shaver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James P. Shaver more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James P. Shaver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James P. Shaver. The network helps show where James P. Shaver may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James P. Shaver
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James P. Shaver.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James P. Shaver based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James P. Shaver. James P. Shaver is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Shaver, James P.. (1991). Handbook of Research on Social Studies Teaching and Learning: a Project of the National Council for the Social Studies.31 indexed citations
3.
Shaver, James P.. (1989). The Modification of Attitudes toward Persons with Disabilities: Is There a Best Way?.. International Journal of Special Education (IJSE). 4(1). 33–57.16 indexed citations
4.
Shaver, James P.. (1988). Cultural Pluralism and a Democratic Society.. Education and Society. 1(1). 11–17.1 indexed citations
5.
Shaver, James P.. (1986). Productivity Program: The Use of Technology to Improve Writing Skills Projects, 1985-86 School Year. Statewide Evaluation Report..1 indexed citations
6.
Shaver, James P.. (1985). Chance and Nonsense: A Conversation about Interpreting Tests of Statistical Significance, Part 1.. Phi Delta Kappan. 67(1). 57–60.27 indexed citations
7.
Shaver, James P.. (1985). Commitment to Values and the Study of Social Problems in Citizenship Education.. Social Education. 49(3).4 indexed citations
8.
Shaver, James P.. (1984). Reflections of Citizenship Education and Traditional Social Studies Programs.. 17(3). 1–15.2 indexed citations
9.
Shaver, James P.. (1980). Toward the Twenty-First Century: Social Studies Goals for Decision-Making and Research Skills.. Journal of research and development in education. 13(2). 36–46.
10.
Shaver, James P., et al.. (1980). Slow Learners and the Study of Contemporary Problems.. Social Education. 44(4). 102–13.17 indexed citations
11.
Shaver, James P.. (1979). The Status of Social Studies Education: Impressions from Three NSF Studies.. Social Education. 43(2).113 indexed citations
12.
Shaver, James P.. (1977). Building rationales for citizenship education.28 indexed citations
13.
Shaver, James P.. (1977). Needed: A Deweyean Rationale for Social Studies. The High School journal.3 indexed citations
14.
Shaver, James P.. (1977). A Critical View of the Social Studies Profession.. Social Education.14 indexed citations
15.
Shaver, James P.. (1974). The Authoritarianism and Dogmatism of Prospective Social Studies Teachers.. Social Education.
16.
Oliver, Donald W. & James P. Shaver. (1974). Teaching public issues in the high school. Utah State University Press eBooks.144 indexed citations
17.
Shaver, James P., et al.. (1969). Economics Learning in Grade One: The USU Assessment Studies.. Sociology of Education.9 indexed citations
18.
Shaver, James P., et al.. (1968). Democracy, pluralism, and the social studies : readings and commentary : an approach to curriculum decisions in the social studies. Houghton Mifflin eBooks.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.