James M. Dorsey
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Sports, Gender, and Society 9
- Transportation top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts 11
- Socioeconomic Development in MENA 8
- Sport and Mega-Event Impacts 7
- Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies 4
- Cultural Studies top 10%
-
- Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East 8
- Islamic Studies and History 7
-
- Belt and Road Initiative 4
- Co-authors
- James H. MoorSurendran RajaratnamKevin G. PinneyC. Michael GarnerAnjan GhatakNicholas V. CozziFarish A. NoorR. Cady
- Journals
- Tetrahedron Letters (1 paper)Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry (1 paper)American Behavioral Scientist (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- SingaporeUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
James M. Dorsey
44 papers receiving 203 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Gender Studies 67
- Transportation 28
- Sociology and Political Science 179
- Cultural Studies 21
- Development 9
Countries citing papers authored by James M. Dorsey
This map shows the geographic impact of James M. Dorsey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James M. Dorsey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James M. Dorsey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James M. Dorsey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James M. Dorsey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James M. Dorsey. The network helps show where James M. Dorsey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 10 scholars most cited alongside James M. Dorsey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 9 | Towards a New World Order in Eurasia? The Role of Russia and China | 2016 | 0 |
| 10 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 11 | Thinking the unthinkable : coming to grips with Islamic state | 2015 | 1 |
| 12 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 12 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 15 | Role of Arab militaries in popular uprisings | 2011 | 1 |
| 16 | Street, shrine, square and soccer pitch : comparative protest spaces in Asia and the Middle East | 2011 | 21 |
| 17 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 10 | |
| 20 | 2004 | 34 |
About James M. Dorsey
James M. Dorsey is a scholar working on General Energy, Gender Studies and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 55 papers that have together received 255 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts (11 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (9 papers), Socioeconomic Development in MENA (8 papers), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (8 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (7 papers), Islamic Studies and History (7 papers), Belt and Road Initiative (4 papers) and Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (67 citations), Transportation (28 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (179 citations). James M. Dorsey has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include James H. Moor, Surendran Rajaratnam, Kevin G. Pinney, C. Michael Garner, Anjan Ghatak, Nicholas V. Cozzi, Farish A. Noor, R. Cady, Kevin J. Armstrong and Thomas B. Parrish. Their work appears in journals such as Tetrahedron Letters, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry and American Behavioral Scientist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.