James M. Blythe
- Information Systems and Management top 0.5%
- Scientific Computing and Data Management 5
-
- Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems 5
- Peer-to-Peer Network Technologies 1
- Information Systems top 0.5%
- Cloud Computing and Resource Management 2
- Hardware and Architecture top 5%
- Classics top 10%
- Byzantine Studies and History 2
-
- Renaissance and Early Modern Studies 2
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 1
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 2
- Co-authors
- Yolanda GilEwa DeelmanKaran VahiCarl KesselmanDaniel S. KatzGaurang MehtaJohn GoodG. Bruce Berriman
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndiaIreland
In The Last Decade
James M. Blythe
14 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Information Systems and Management 856
- Computer Networks and Communications 1.1k
- Information Systems 782
- Hardware and Architecture 152
- Classics 15
Countries citing papers authored by James M. Blythe
This map shows the geographic impact of James M. Blythe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James M. Blythe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James M. Blythe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James M. Blythe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James M. Blythe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James M. Blythe. The network helps show where James M. Blythe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James M. Blythe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 0 | |
| 3 | Implementing weighted abduction in Markov logic | 2011 | 13 |
| 4 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 6 | Learning Information-Gathering Procedures by Combined Demonstration and Instruction | 2007 | 1 |
| 7 | Was Ptolemy of Lucca a civic humanist? Reflections on a newly-discovered manuscript of Hans Baron | 2005 | 3 |
| 8 | Pegasus: A Framework for Mapping Complex Scientific Workflows onto Distributed Systemsbreakdown → | 2005 | 844 |
| 9 | 2005 | 241 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 88 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 28 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 2 | |
| 13 | Pegasus: Planning for Execution in Grids | 2002 | 39 |
| 14 | 2000 | 35 | |
| 15 | 1992 | 33 | |
| 16 | 1986 | 11 |
About James M. Blythe
James M. Blythe is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Classics and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 16 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (5 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (5 papers), Cloud Computing and Resource Management (2 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (2 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (2 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper) and Peer-to-Peer Network Technologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (856 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (1.1k citations) and Information Systems (782 citations). James M. Blythe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Yolanda Gil, Ewa Deelman, Karan Vahi, Carl Kesselman, Daniel S. Katz, Gaurang Mehta, John Good, G. Bruce Berriman, A. C. Laity and Mei-Hui Su.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.