Gaurang Mehta

7.4k total citations · 4 hit papers
50 papers, 3.7k citations indexed

About

Gaurang Mehta is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems and Management and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Gaurang Mehta has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 3.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 43 papers in Computer Networks and Communications, 42 papers in Information Systems and Management and 12 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Gaurang Mehta's work include Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (43 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (42 papers) and Advanced Data Storage Technologies (14 papers). Gaurang Mehta is often cited by papers focused on Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (43 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (42 papers) and Advanced Data Storage Technologies (14 papers). Gaurang Mehta collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Denmark. Gaurang Mehta's co-authors include Ewa Deelman, Karan Vahi, Ann Chervenak, Mei-Hui Su, Gideon Juve, G. Bruce Berriman, Carl Kesselman, John Good, Yolanda Gil and Gurmeet Singh and has published in prestigious journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, Bioinformatics and Future Generation Computer Systems.

In The Last Decade

Gaurang Mehta

50 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Hit Papers

Pegasus: A Framework for Mapping Complex Scientific Workf... 2005 2026 2012 2019 2005 2012 2008 2010 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Gaurang Mehta United States 24 3.0k 2.4k 2.1k 297 251 50 3.7k
Karan Vahi United States 23 3.5k 1.2× 2.7k 1.1× 2.5k 1.2× 375 1.3× 278 1.1× 61 4.1k
Gideon Juve United States 25 2.4k 0.8× 2.0k 0.9× 1.6k 0.7× 147 0.5× 223 0.9× 52 3.0k
Marta Mattoso Brazil 21 1.3k 0.4× 1.2k 0.5× 1.2k 0.6× 18 0.1× 355 1.4× 174 2.0k
Marian Bubak Poland 17 747 0.2× 415 0.2× 475 0.2× 112 0.4× 113 0.5× 137 1.1k
Lavanya Ramakrishnan United States 21 1.3k 0.4× 1.1k 0.5× 523 0.2× 161 0.5× 147 0.6× 89 1.7k
Shrideep Pallickara United States 20 1.1k 0.4× 758 0.3× 216 0.1× 115 0.4× 281 1.1× 123 1.6k
Iván Rodero United States 19 852 0.3× 689 0.3× 186 0.1× 185 0.6× 141 0.6× 84 1.1k
Fran Berman United States 16 1.4k 0.5× 714 0.3× 439 0.2× 635 2.1× 158 0.6× 22 1.7k
Dennis McLeod United States 21 971 0.3× 525 0.2× 97 0.0× 27 0.1× 936 3.7× 107 1.6k
Zhihui Du China 18 737 0.2× 531 0.2× 47 0.0× 94 0.3× 244 1.0× 135 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Gaurang Mehta

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gaurang Mehta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gaurang Mehta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gaurang Mehta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gaurang Mehta

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gaurang Mehta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gaurang Mehta. The network helps show where Gaurang Mehta may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gaurang Mehta

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gaurang Mehta. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gaurang Mehta based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gaurang Mehta. Gaurang Mehta is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mehta, Gaurang, et al.. (2023). Calibration of transition risk for corporate bonds. British Actuarial Journal. 28. 1 indexed citations
2.
Vahi, Karan, Ian F. Harvey, Taghrid Samak, et al.. (2012). A General Approach to Real-Time Workflow Monitoring. ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University). 108–118. 14 indexed citations
3.
Rynge, Mats, S. Callaghan, Ewa Deelman, et al.. (2012). Enabling large-scale scientific workflows on petascale resources using MPI master/worker. 1–8. 9 indexed citations
4.
Juve, Gideon, et al.. (2012). Characterizing and profiling scientific workflows. Future Generation Computer Systems. 29(3). 682–692. 582 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Gunter, Dan, Ewa Deelman, Taghrid Samak, et al.. (2011). Online workflow management and performance analysis with stampede. 152–161. 24 indexed citations
6.
Samak, Taghrid, Dan Gunter, Ewa Deelman, et al.. (2011). Failure prediction and localization in large scientific workflows. 107–116. 16 indexed citations
7.
Samak, Taghrid, Dan Gunter, Ewa Deelman, et al.. (2011). Online Fault and Anomaly Detection for Large-Scale Scientific Workflows. 373–381. 18 indexed citations
8.
Kumar, Vijay, Tahsin Kurç, Varun Ratnakar, et al.. (2010). Parameterized specification, configuration and execution of data-intensive scientific workflows. Cluster Computing. 13(3). 315–333. 10 indexed citations
9.
Saccone, Scott F., Raphaël Bolze, Paul D. Thomas, et al.. (2010). SPOT: a web-based tool for using biological databases to prioritize SNPs after a genome-wide association study. Nucleic Acids Research. 38(Web Server). W201–W209. 46 indexed citations
10.
Groth, Paul, Ewa Deelman, Gideon Juve, Gaurang Mehta, & G. Bruce Berriman. (2009). Pipeline-centric provenance model. 1–8. 27 indexed citations
11.
Chervenak, Ann, et al.. (2008). Characterization of scientific workflows. 1–10. 437 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Singh, Gurmeet, Mei-Hui Su, Karan Vahi, et al.. (2008). Workflow task clustering for best effort systems with Pegasus. 1–8. 64 indexed citations
13.
Gil, Yolanda, Varun Ratnakar, Ewa Deelman, Gaurang Mehta, & Jihie Kim. (2007). Wings for Pegasus: creating large-scale scientific applications using semantic representations of computational workflows. Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 1767–1774. 81 indexed citations
14.
Deelman, Ewa, et al.. (2007). Integrating existing scientific workflow systems: the Kepler/Pegasus example. 1 indexed citations
15.
Deelman, Ewa, Miron Livny, Gaurang Mehta, et al.. (2006). Pegasus and DAGMan From Concept to Execution: Mapping Scientific Workflows onto Today's Cyberinfrastructure.. IEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing, Data, and Analytics. 56–74. 6 indexed citations
16.
Nefedova, Veronika, Robert Jacob, Ian Foster, et al.. (2006). Automating Climate Science: Large Ensemble Simulations on the TeraGrid with the GriPhyN Virtual Data System. 32–32. 19 indexed citations
17.
Taylor, Valerie, et al.. (2005). Performance Prediction-based versus Load-based Site Selection: Quantifying the Difference.. 148–153. 11 indexed citations
18.
Maechling, P. J., Hans Chalupsky, Ewa Deelman, et al.. (2005). Simplifying construction of complex workflows for non-expert users of the Southern California Earthquake Center Community Modeling Environment. ACM SIGMOD Record. 34(3). 24–30. 38 indexed citations
19.
Blythe, Jim, Ewa Deelman, Yolanda Gil, et al.. (2003). The role of planning in Grid computing. International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling. 154–163. 58 indexed citations
20.
Deelman, Ewa, Carl Kesselman, Gaurang Mehta, et al.. (2003). GriPhyN and LIGO, building a virtual data Grid for gravitational wave scientists. 225–234. 86 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026