This map shows the geographic impact of Chris Wroe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chris Wroe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chris Wroe more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chris Wroe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chris Wroe. The network helps show where Chris Wroe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chris Wroe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chris Wroe.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chris Wroe based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Chris Wroe. Chris Wroe is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Martínez-Costa, Catalina, Chris Wroe, George Demetriou, et al.. (2017). Experiments to Create Ontology-based Disease Models for Diabetic Retinopathy from Different Biomedical Resources..2 indexed citations
Wolstencroft, Katherine, Tom Oinn, Carole Goble, et al.. (2006). Panoply of Utilities in Taverna. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 3. 156–162.14 indexed citations
Wroe, Chris, Phillip Lord, Simon Miles, et al.. (2004). Recycling Services and Workflows through Discovery and Reuse. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).
Goble, Carole & Chris Wroe. (2004). The Montagues and the Capulets. Comparative and Functional Genomics. 5(8). 623–632.11 indexed citations
10.
Hull, Duncan, R. Stevens, Phillip Lord, et al.. (2004). Treating Shimantic Web Syndrome with Ontologies. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).41 indexed citations
11.
Lord, Phillip, Chris Wroe, Robert Stevens, et al.. (2003). Semantic and Personalised Service Discovery. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).10 indexed citations
12.
Zhao, Jun, Carole Goble, Mark Greenwood, Chris Wroe, & Robert Stevens. (2003). Annotating, Linking and Browsing Provenance Logs for {e-Science}. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).54 indexed citations
13.
Stevens, Robert, Chris Wroe, Sean Bechhofer, et al.. (2003). Building ontologies in DAML + OIL. Comparative and Functional Genomics. 4(1). 133–141.13 indexed citations
14.
Goble, Carole, Chris Wroe, & R. Stevens. (2003). The {my}Grid Project: Services, Architecture and Demonstrator. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 595–603.28 indexed citations
15.
Greenwood, Mark, Chris Wroe, Robert Stevens, Carole Goble, & Matthew Addis. (2002). Are bioinformaticians doing e-Business?. Electronic workshops in computing.2 indexed citations
16.
Rector, Alan, Jeremy Rogers, Angus Roberts, & Chris Wroe. (2002). Scale and context: issues in ontologies to link health- and bio-informatics.. PubMed. 642–6.10 indexed citations
Wroe, Chris, James J. Cimino, & Alan Rector. (2001). Integrating existing drug formulation terminologies into an HL7 standard classification using OpenGALEN.. PubMed. 766–70.11 indexed citations
19.
Wroe, Chris, W D Solomon, Jeremy Rogers, & Alan Rector. (2000). Inheritance of Drug Information.. PubMed Central. 1158–1158.4 indexed citations
20.
Solomon, W D, Angus Roberts, J E Rogers, Chris Wroe, & Alan Rector. (2000). Having our cake and eating it too: how the GALEN Intermediate Representation reconciles internal complexity with users' requirements for appropriateness and simplicity.. PubMed. 819–23.10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.