Daniel S. Katz

8.8k total citations · 2 hit papers
191 papers, 3.9k citations indexed

About

Daniel S. Katz is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems and Management and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel S. Katz has authored 191 papers receiving a total of 3.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 106 papers in Computer Networks and Communications, 101 papers in Information Systems and Management and 65 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Daniel S. Katz's work include Scientific Computing and Data Management (99 papers), Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (88 papers) and Advanced Data Storage Technologies (43 papers). Daniel S. Katz is often cited by papers focused on Scientific Computing and Data Management (99 papers), Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (88 papers) and Advanced Data Storage Technologies (43 papers). Daniel S. Katz collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Daniel S. Katz's co-authors include John Good, Ewa Deelman, Allen Taflove, G. Bruce Berriman, Joseph C. Jacob, A. C. Laity, Everett Thiele, Gurmeet Singh, Carl Kesselman and Ian Foster and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and American Psychologist.

In The Last Decade

Daniel S. Katz

179 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Hit Papers

Pegasus: A Framework for Mapping Complex Scientific Workf... 2005 2026 2012 2019 2005 2022 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel S. Katz United States 28 2.3k 1.9k 1.7k 531 458 191 3.9k
Tony Hey United Kingdom 29 1.5k 0.7× 976 0.5× 1.0k 0.6× 194 0.4× 580 1.3× 152 4.6k
David Walker United Kingdom 33 2.3k 1.0× 290 0.2× 776 0.5× 353 0.7× 1.7k 3.8× 183 5.1k
John Shalf United States 37 3.9k 1.7× 444 0.2× 1.1k 0.6× 1.2k 2.3× 3.1k 6.8× 172 6.0k
Anthony Skjellum United States 25 2.2k 1.0× 143 0.1× 997 0.6× 390 0.7× 1.6k 3.6× 165 3.9k
Douglas Thain United States 25 2.5k 1.1× 1.1k 0.6× 1.4k 0.8× 61 0.1× 694 1.5× 153 3.2k
Marc Snir United States 43 4.8k 2.1× 204 0.1× 898 0.5× 942 1.8× 3.5k 7.6× 181 7.3k
Peer‐Timo Bremer United States 38 628 0.3× 184 0.1× 275 0.2× 236 0.4× 340 0.7× 198 4.8k
Mladen A. Vouk United States 30 1.5k 0.6× 270 0.1× 2.0k 1.2× 258 0.5× 132 0.3× 216 3.8k
Michael A. Heroux United States 22 787 0.3× 210 0.1× 313 0.2× 302 0.6× 758 1.7× 85 2.2k
Ewa Deelman United States 50 9.4k 4.1× 6.3k 3.2× 7.1k 4.1× 126 0.2× 1.1k 2.5× 275 11.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel S. Katz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel S. Katz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel S. Katz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel S. Katz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel S. Katz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel S. Katz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel S. Katz. The network helps show where Daniel S. Katz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel S. Katz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel S. Katz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel S. Katz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel S. Katz. Daniel S. Katz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pérez‐Riverol, Yasset, Wout Bittremieux, William Stafford Noble, et al.. (2025). Open-Source and FAIR Research Software for Proteomics. Journal of Proteome Research. 24(5). 2222–2234. 6 indexed citations
2.
Westner, Britta U., Daniel McCloy, Eric B. Larson, et al.. (2025). Cycling on the Freeway: The perilous state of open-source neuroscience software. Imaging Neuroscience. 3. 2 indexed citations
3.
Döll, Petra, et al.. (2024). Software sustainability of global impact models. Geoscientific model development. 17(23). 8593–8611.
4.
Hosseini, Mohammad, et al.. (2024). Group authorship, an excellent opportunity laced with ethical, legal and technical challenges. Accountability in Research. 32(5). 762–784. 6 indexed citations
5.
Ananthakrishnan, Rachana, Yadu Babuji, Kyle Chard, et al.. (2024). Enabling Remote Management of FaaS Endpoints with Globus Compute Multi-User Endpoints. Knowledge@UChicago (University of Chicago). 1–5. 2 indexed citations
8.
Jensen, Eric & Daniel S. Katz. (2023). From Code to Tenure: Valuing Research Software in Academia. 2 indexed citations
9.
Marinov, Darko, et al.. (2023). Automatic Reproduction of Workflows in the Snakemake Workflow Catalog and nf-core Registries. 74–84. 3 indexed citations
10.
Duarte, J., A. Roy, E. A. Huerta, et al.. (2023). FAIR AI models in high energy physics. Machine Learning Science and Technology. 4(4). 45062–45062. 3 indexed citations
11.
Lamprecht, Anna-Lena, Carlos Martínez-Ortiz, Michelle Barker, et al.. (2022). What do we (not) know about Research Software Engineering?. elib (German Aerospace Center). 1 indexed citations
12.
Godoy, William F., Ritu Arora, K. Beattie, et al.. (2022). Giving Research Software Engineers a Larger Stage Through the Better Scientific Software Fellowship. Computing in Science & Engineering. 24(5). 6–13. 1 indexed citations
13.
Barker, Michelle, Neil Chue Hong, Daniel S. Katz, et al.. (2022). Introducing the FAIR Principles for research software. Scientific Data. 9(1). 622–622. 175 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Huerta, E. A., Asad Khan, Edward Davis, et al.. (2020). Convergence of artificial intelligence and high performance computing on NSF-supported cyberinfrastructure. Journal Of Big Data. 7(1). 36 indexed citations
15.
Barley, William C., et al.. (2020). Understanding the multifaceted geospatial software ecosystem: a survey approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems. 35(11). 2168–2186. 6 indexed citations
16.
Zhang, Kaihao, Matthew Robertson, Kevin Cruse, et al.. (2020). Crowd-Sourced Data and Analysis Tools for Advancing the Chemical Vapor Deposition of Graphene: Implications for Manufacturing. ACS Applied Nano Materials. 3(10). 10144–10155. 4 indexed citations
17.
Barker, Michelle, Sílvia D. Olabarriaga, Nancy Wilkins‐Diehr, et al.. (2019). The global impact of science gateways, virtual research environments and virtual laboratories. Future Generation Computer Systems. 95. 240–248. 36 indexed citations
18.
Katz, Daniel S. & Na Hong. (2018). FAIR is not Fair Enough, Particularly for Software Citation, Availability, or Quality. AGUFM. 2018. 1 indexed citations
19.
Katz, Daniel S., Kyle E. Niemeyer, Arfon M. Smith, et al.. (2016). Software vs. data in the context of citation. 15 indexed citations
20.
Katz, Daniel S., S. Callaghan, Robert P. Harkness, et al.. (2010). Science on the TeraGrid. Computational Methods in Science and Technology. Special Issue(1). 81–97. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026