James L. Golden
- Philosophy top 2%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Communication top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations
- Co-authors
- Edward P. J. CorbettJoseph J. PilottaJ. Gregory PayneScott C. RatzanChaïm PerelmanThomas JeffersonDouglas Walton
- Topics
- American Constitutional Law and Politics (7 papers)Rhetoric and Communication Studies (6 papers)Academic Freedom and Politics (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
James L. Golden
24 papers receiving 229 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Philosophy 121
- Literature and Literary Theory 83
- Communication 76
- Sociology and Political Science 47
- Political Science and International Relations 38
Countries citing papers authored by James L. Golden
This map shows the geographic impact of James L. Golden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James L. Golden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James L. Golden more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James L. Golden
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James L. Golden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James L. Golden. The network helps show where James L. Golden may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James L. Golden
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James L. Golden. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James L. Golden based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James L. Golden. James L. Golden is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | Essays on the rhetoric of the Western World | 6 |
| 8 | Meyer's Theory of Problematology in Le Questionnement. | 3 |
| 9 | The Rhetoric of Blair, Campbell, and Whately | 31 |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | Practical reasoning in human affairs : studies in honor of Chaim Perelman | 8 |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | The rhetoric of Western thought | 109 |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | Thomas Jefferson and the rhetoric of virtue | 4 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About James L. Golden
James L. Golden is a scholar working on Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations and Public Administration, having authored 30 papers that have together received 273 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (7 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (6 papers) and Academic Freedom and Politics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (76 citations), Philosophy (121 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (83 citations). James L. Golden has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Edward P. J. Corbett, Joseph J. Pilotta, J. Gregory Payne, Scott C. Ratzan, Chaïm Perelman, Thomas Jefferson and Douglas Walton. Their work appears in journals such as American Behavioral Scientist, Noûs and Quarterly Journal of Speech.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.