James K. Scott
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Communication top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Public Administration top 10%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Co-authors
- Thomas G. JohnsonEdward BrentJohn SpencerNicholas BuckJonathan GershunyJane MinnemaJohn BielinskiMartha L. Thurlow
- Topics
- Social Media and Politics (3 papers)E-Government and Public Services (3 papers)Information Systems Theories and Implementation (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBelgiumUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
James K. Scott
13 papers receiving 217 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Political Science and International Relations 165
- Communication 118
- Sociology and Political Science 65
- Public Administration 43
- Artificial Intelligence 36
Countries citing papers authored by James K. Scott
This map shows the geographic impact of James K. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James K. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James K. Scott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James K. Scott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James K. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James K. Scott. The network helps show where James K. Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James K. Scott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James K. Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James K. Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James K. Scott. James K. Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Research Administrative Burden: A Qualitative Study of Local Variations and Relational Effects. | 1 |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 145 | |
| 4 | 30 | |
| 5 | 33 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | Changing households: the BHPS 1990 to 1992. | 8 |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 9 |
About James K. Scott
James K. Scott is a scholar working on Communication, Management Science and Operations Research and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 13 papers that have together received 255 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Media and Politics (3 papers), E-Government and Public Services (3 papers) and Information Systems Theories and Implementation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (118 citations), Public Administration (43 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (165 citations). James K. Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Thomas G. Johnson, Edward Brent, John Spencer, Nicholas Buck, Jonathan Gershuny, Jane Minnema, John Bielinski and Martha L. Thurlow. Their work appears in journals such as Public Administration Review, Social Studies of Science and Qualitative Sociology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.