Qualitative Sociology

1.1k papers and 28.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Qualitative Sociology in the last decades have received a total of 28.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Qualitative Sociology usually cover Sociology and Political Science (678 papers), Gender Studies (141 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (113 papers) specifically the topics of Social and Cultural Dynamics (98 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (83 papers) and Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (54 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Qualitative Sociology are Anselm Strauss, Juliet Corbin, David L. Altheide, Loïc Wacquant, Kevin D. Haggerty, Eviatar Zerubavel, Thomas Muhr, Dona Schwartz, Elisabeth Jean Wood and Joseph C. Hermanowicz.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Qualitative Sociology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Qualitative Sociology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Qualitative Sociology.

Countries where authors publish in Qualitative Sociology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Qualitative Sociology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Qualitative Sociology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Qualitative Sociology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025