James Gladstone

793 citations
24 papers · 575 indexed · h-index 16

James Gladstone

24 papers receiving 524 citations

Peers

James Gladstone
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Public Administration 72
  • Safety Research 128
  • Demography 159
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 20
  • General Health Professions 242
Replace Stacey Kolomer with:
Stacey Kolomer United States
Roberta R. Greene United States
Joan Levy Zlotnik United States
Joan Rapaport United Kingdom
Rebecca L. Hegar United States
Tamara Fuller United States
Irene A. Gutheil United States
Shirley Ben Shlomo Israel
Wendy Hulko Canada
Julie Miller‐Cribbs United States
James Gladstone relative to Stacey Kolomer United States Stacey Kolomer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Stacey Kolomer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Gladstone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Gladstone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Gladstone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Gladstone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Gladstone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Gladstone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Gladstone. The network helps show where James Gladstone may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 10 scholars most cited alongside James Gladstone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Gladstone Line = papers co-authored together James Gladstone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201723
2 201651
3 201443
4
Grandparent Involvement in Child Welfare Intervention With Grandchildren
20121
5 20124
6 201170
7 200936
8 200721
9 200719
10 200645
11 200228
12 200221
13 200041
14 199827
15 19974
16 199532
17 199518
18
Adoption Disclosure Counseling as Perceived by Adult Adoptees and Biological Relatives.
19926
19 19923
20 198834

About James Gladstone

James Gladstone is a scholar working on Public Administration, Research and Theory, Safety Research, Demography and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 575 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (14 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (8 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (6 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (4 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (4 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (3 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (3 papers) and Family Dynamics and Relationships (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (72 citations), Safety Research (128 citations), Demography (159 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (20 citations) and General Health Professions (242 citations). James Gladstone has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Koster, Ralph Adams Brown, Gary C. Dumbrill, Bruce Leslie, Sherry L. Dupuis, Michelle Young, Afisi Ismaila, Anne Westhues, Michelle Charles and Tom Reynolds. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement, Children and Youth Services Review, The Gerontologist, Ageing and Society and Child welfare.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026