James Gebel
- Epidemiology top 1%
- Neurology top 0.5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 2%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- Joseph P. BroderickJane KhouryArthur PancioliRakesh ShuklaEdward C. JauchLawrence R. WechslerDaniel WooBrett Kissela
- Topics
- Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (32 papers)Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (18 papers)Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCzechia
In The Last Decade
James Gebel
48 papers receiving 4.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
- Epidemiology 2.5k
- Neurology 2.1k
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1.1k
- Molecular Biology 694
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 673
Countries citing papers authored by James Gebel
This map shows the geographic impact of James Gebel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Gebel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Gebel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Gebel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Gebel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Gebel. The network helps show where James Gebel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Gebel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Gebel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Gebel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Gebel. James Gebel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | Pretreatment ipsilateral regional cortical blood flow influences vessel recanalization in intra-arterial thrombolysis for MCA occlusion. | 27 |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 220 | |
| 9 | 129 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 181 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 33 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 78 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 81 |
About James Gebel
James Gebel is a scholar working on Internal Medicine, Neurology and Rehabilitation, having authored 48 papers that have together received 5.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (32 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (18 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (2.1k citations), Developmental Neuroscience (554 citations) and Internal Medicine (406 citations). James Gebel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Joseph P. Broderick, Jane Khoury, Arthur Pancioli, Rakesh Shukla, Edward C. Jauch, Lawrence R. Wechsler, Daniel Woo, Brett Kissela, Thomas G. Brott and Jerzy P. Szaflarski. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Neurology and Diabetes Care.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.