James Field
Impact in
- Education top 10%
- Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Reflective Practices in Education
Papers in
- Education 10
- Qualitative Research Methods and Applications 3
- Online and Blended Learning 2
-
- Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics 3
- Co-authors
- Margaret Macintyre Latta (2 shared papers)Nancy J. Moules (4 shared papers)Catherine M. Laing (4 shared papers)Graham McCaffrey (1 shared paper)Jin G. Park (1 shared paper)Preston Hunter (1 shared paper)Andrea Throop (1 shared paper)Amit Sharma (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Teaching and Teacher Education (3 papers)Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing (1 paper)Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (1 paper)Nucleic Acids Research (1 paper)Contemporary Educational Technology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
James Field
23 papers receiving 403 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
- Education 98
- Human Factors and Ergonomics 6
- Research and Theory 2
- Speech and Hearing 14
- Communication 14
Countries citing papers authored by James Field
This map shows the geographic impact of James Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Field more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Field
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Field. The network helps show where James Field may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 168 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 72 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 41 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 17 | |
| 7 | 1986 | 16 | |
| 8 | 1999 | 12 | |
| 9 | 1992 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1996 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1994 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1998 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 2 |
About James Field
James Field is a scholar working on Education, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Communication and Urban Studies, having authored 26 papers that have together received 428 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (3 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (3 papers), Public Spaces through Art (3 papers), Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (3 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Applications (3 papers), Online and Blended Learning (2 papers), E-Learning and Knowledge Management (2 papers) and Public Relations and Crisis Communication (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (98 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (6 citations), Research and Theory (2 citations), Speech and Hearing (14 citations) and Communication (14 citations). James Field has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Margaret Macintyre Latta, Nancy J. Moules, Catherine M. Laing, Graham McCaffrey, Jin G. Park, Preston Hunter, Andrea Throop, Amit Sharma, Jason C. Steel and Andrea E. Price. Their work appears in journals such as Teaching and Teacher Education, Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Nucleic Acids Research and Contemporary Educational Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.