James Daybell
Impact in
Papers in
- History 13
- Scottish History and National Identity 7
- Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes 3
-
- Historical Influence and Diplomacy 9
- Co-authors
- Susan Broomhall (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- English Literary Renaissance (2 papers)Sixteenth Century Journal (2 papers)The English Historical Review (2 papers)Literature Compass (1 paper)Women s History Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
James Daybell
17 papers receiving 109 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- History 93
- Classics 26
- Museology 20
- Literature and Literary Theory 48
- Religious studies 20
Countries citing papers authored by James Daybell
This map shows the geographic impact of James Daybell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Daybell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Daybell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Daybell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Daybell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Daybell. The network helps show where James Daybell may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside James Daybell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 50 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 42 | |
| 3 | The Material Letter in Early Modern England: Manuscript Letters and the Culture and Practices of Letter-Writing, 1512-1635 | 2012 | 32 |
| 4 | Material readings of early modern culture : texts and social practices, 1580-1730 | 2010 | 13 |
| 5 | 1999 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 15 | Introduction : Rethinking gender and political culture in early modern Europe | 2016 | 1 |
| 16 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2005 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2009 | 0 |
About James Daybell
James Daybell is a scholar working on History, Political Science and International Relations, Literature and Literary Theory, Religious studies and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 26 papers that have together received 179 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Influence and Diplomacy (9 papers), Early Modern Women Writers (7 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (7 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (4 papers), Autobiographical and Biographical Writing (4 papers), Philippine History and Culture (3 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (3 papers) and Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (93 citations), Classics (26 citations), Museology (20 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (48 citations) and Religious studies (20 citations). James Daybell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Susan Broomhall. Their work appears in journals such as English Literary Renaissance, Sixteenth Century Journal, The English Historical Review, Literature Compass and Women s History Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.