James D. Young

2.1k total citations
48 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

James D. Young is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, James D. Young has authored 48 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Ophthalmology, 10 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in James D. Young's work include Sports injuries and prevention (10 papers), Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Treatments (8 papers) and Sports Performance and Training (7 papers). James D. Young is often cited by papers focused on Sports injuries and prevention (10 papers), Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Treatments (8 papers) and Sports Performance and Training (7 papers). James D. Young collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Germany. James D. Young's co-authors include C J MacEwen, David G. Behm, Daniel D. Hodgson, Jonathan C. Reid, Patrick Quigley, Urs Granacher, Joseph Whitten, S. Ogston, Anis Chaouachi and H E Willshaw and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Physiology, American Journal of Ophthalmology and British Journal of Ophthalmology.

In The Last Decade

James D. Young

44 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James D. Young United Kingdom 18 651 445 409 304 159 48 1.3k
F. D. BURKE United Kingdom 24 85 0.1× 157 0.4× 43 0.1× 1.2k 4.0× 82 0.5× 74 1.6k
N. John Yousif United States 27 38 0.1× 28 0.1× 525 1.3× 1.3k 4.4× 78 0.5× 63 1.8k
James H. Roth Canada 28 54 0.1× 265 0.6× 19 0.0× 2.8k 9.3× 378 2.4× 57 3.2k
Çağatay Barut Türkiye 16 22 0.0× 39 0.1× 30 0.1× 250 0.8× 39 0.2× 73 637
Larry Benjamin United Kingdom 15 597 0.9× 10 0.0× 95 0.2× 173 0.6× 10 0.1× 38 991
Niels Thomsen Sweden 24 30 0.0× 147 0.3× 25 0.1× 796 2.6× 39 0.2× 67 1.2k
R Tubiana France 22 21 0.0× 104 0.2× 42 0.1× 1.2k 4.1× 81 0.5× 112 1.7k
J. Alexander de Ru Netherlands 18 34 0.1× 24 0.1× 45 0.1× 387 1.3× 11 0.1× 59 1.0k
Edward J. Ryan United States 18 11 0.0× 221 0.5× 20 0.0× 63 0.2× 169 1.1× 58 920
Stefano Vercelli Italy 17 5 0.0× 302 0.7× 184 0.4× 1.1k 3.7× 331 2.1× 54 1.8k

Countries citing papers authored by James D. Young

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James D. Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James D. Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James D. Young more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James D. Young

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James D. Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James D. Young. The network helps show where James D. Young may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James D. Young

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James D. Young. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James D. Young based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James D. Young. James D. Young is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Young, James D., et al.. (2019). The Death Penalty: The Law Lords Alter Course in the Commonwealth Caribbean. 10(2). 4. 1 indexed citations
2.
Young, James D., et al.. (2019). Unilateral hamstrings static stretching can impair the affected and contralateral knee extension force but improve unilateral drop jump height. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 119(9). 1943–1949. 12 indexed citations
3.
Ghram, Amine, et al.. (2019). Unilateral Knee and Ankle Joint Fatigue Induce Similar Impairment to Bipedal Balance in Judo Athletes. Journal of Human Kinetics. 66(1). 7–18. 17 indexed citations
4.
Reid, Jonathan C., et al.. (2018). The effects of different durations of static stretching within a comprehensive warm-up on voluntary and evoked contractile properties. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 118(7). 1427–1445. 54 indexed citations
5.
Behm, David G., James D. Young, Joseph Whitten, et al.. (2017). Effectiveness of Traditional Strength vs. Power Training on Muscle Strength, Power and Speed with Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Physiology. 8. 423–423. 170 indexed citations
6.
Young, James D., et al.. (2017). Unilateral Rolling of the Foot did not Affect Non-Local Range of Motion or Balance.. PubMed. 16(2). 209–218. 26 indexed citations
7.
Döweling, Alexander, James D. Young, Patrick Quigley, et al.. (2016). An acute session of roller massage prolongs voluntary torque development and diminishes evoked pain. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 117(1). 109–117. 91 indexed citations
8.
Young, James D., et al.. (2007). Retaining Indigenous Students within Health Sciences Courses at the University of South Australia. RUNE (Research UNE). 9(1). 33. 4 indexed citations
9.
Young, James D., et al.. (2003). Camshaft Roller Chain Drive with Reduced Meshing Impact Noise Levels. SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series. 1. 7 indexed citations
10.
Soran, Özlem, James D. Young, Richard Holubkov, et al.. (1999). Effect of inotrope withdrawal on morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure: Results of the vesnarinone trial withdrawal substudy. Journal of Cardiac Failure. 5(3). 195–200. 4 indexed citations
11.
Maini, Rishma, C J MacEwen, & James D. Young. (1998). The natural history of epiphora in childhood. Eye. 12(4). 669–671. 22 indexed citations
12.
Ellis, John, C J MacEwen, & James D. Young. (1998). Can Congenital Nasolacrimal-duct Obstruction Interfere With Visual Development? A Cohort Case Control Study. Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus. 35(2). 81–85. 22 indexed citations
13.
Sanders, Roshini, et al.. (1997). Comparison of catecholamine and pressor effects in peribulbar and retrobulbar anaesthesia in cataract surgery. Eye. 11(5). 644–648. 12 indexed citations
14.
Young, James D. & C J MacEwen. (1997). Fortnightly review: Managing congenital lacrimal obstruction in general practice. BMJ. 315(7103). 293–296. 52 indexed citations
15.
Sanders, Roshini, Shelby L. Sturrock, & James D. Young. (1996). Trabeculectomy in the second eye. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica. 74(2). 163–165. 5 indexed citations
16.
Young, James D., C J MacEwen, & S. Ogston. (1996). Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in the second year of life: A multicentre trial of management. Eye. 10(4). 485–491. 70 indexed citations
17.
MacEwen, C J & James D. Young. (1991). Epiphora during the first year of life. Eye. 5(5). 596–600. 280 indexed citations
18.
MacEwen, C J & James D. Young. (1991). The Fluorescein Disappearance Test (FDT): An Evaluation of Its Use in Infants. Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus. 28(6). 302–305. 62 indexed citations
19.
Young, James D.. (1988). Head Posture Measurement. Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus. 25(2). 86–89. 14 indexed citations
20.
Williamson, John, et al.. (1985). Comparative efficacy of orally and topically administered beta blockers for chronic simple glaucoma.. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 69(1). 41–45. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026