James D. Young
- Ophthalmology top 1%
- Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Treatments 8
-
- Sports injuries and prevention 10
- Sports Performance and Training 7
- Dermatology top 1%
- Cancer and Skin Lesions 5
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation 5
-
- Scottish History and National Identity 5
-
- Irish and British Studies 5
-
- Muscle activation and electromyography studies 4
- Co-authors
- C J MacEwenDavid G. BehmDaniel D. HodgsonJonathan C. ReidPatrick QuigleyUrs GranacherJoseph WhittenS. Ogston
- Journals
- Journal of Applied Physiology (1 paper)American Journal of Ophthalmology (1 paper)British Journal of Ophthalmology (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaGermany
In The Last Decade
James D. Young
44 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Ophthalmology 651
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 445
- Dermatology 409
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 45
- Pharmacology 159
Countries citing papers authored by James D. Young
This map shows the geographic impact of James D. Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James D. Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James D. Young more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James D. Young
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James D. Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James D. Young. The network helps show where James D. Young may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James D. Young, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Death Penalty: The Law Lords Alter Course in the Commonwealth Caribbean | 2019 | 1 |
| 2 | 2019 | 12 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 54 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 170 | |
| 6 | Unilateral Rolling of the Foot did not Affect Non-Local Range of Motion or Balance. | 2017 | 26 |
| 7 | 2016 | 91 | |
| 8 | Retaining Indigenous Students within Health Sciences Courses at the University of South Australia | 2007 | 4 |
| 9 | 2003 | 7 | |
| 10 | 1999 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1998 | 22 | |
| 12 | 1998 | 22 | |
| 13 | 1997 | 12 | |
| 14 | 1997 | 52 | |
| 15 | 1996 | 5 | |
| 16 | 1996 | 70 | |
| 17 | 1991 | 280 | |
| 18 | 1991 | 62 | |
| 19 | 1988 | 14 | |
| 20 | 1985 | 13 |
About James D. Young
James D. Young is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Dermatology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sports injuries and prevention (10 papers), Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Treatments (8 papers), Sports Performance and Training (7 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (5 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers), Irish and British Studies (5 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (5 papers) and Muscle activation and electromyography studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (651 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (445 citations) and Dermatology (409 citations). James D. Young has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include C J MacEwen, David G. Behm, Daniel D. Hodgson, Jonathan C. Reid, Patrick Quigley, Urs Granacher, Joseph Whitten, S. Ogston, Anis Chaouachi and H E Willshaw. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physiology, American Journal of Ophthalmology and British Journal of Ophthalmology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.