James D. Laing

29 papers receiving 621 citations

Peers

James D. Laing
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Management Science and Operations Research 138
  • Statistics and Probability 87
  • General Decision Sciences 17
  • Safety Research 69
  • Economics and Econometrics 141
Replace David E. Wiley with:
David E. Wiley United States
Emile Servan-Schreiber United States
David A. Schum United States
Mengyang Cao United States
David D. McFarland United States
Patrick D. Larkey United States
Warren Thorngate Canada
Kathleen M. Sheehan United States
Sema Barlas United States
Einar Breivik Norway
James D. Laing relative to David E. Wiley United States David E. Wiley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
David E. Wiley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James D. Laing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James D. Laing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James D. Laing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James D. Laing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James D. Laing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James D. Laing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James D. Laing. The network helps show where James D. Laing may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside James D. Laing, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James D. Laing Line = papers co-authored together James D. Laing links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1977170
2 1978127
3 197874
4
Analysis of ordinal data
197746
5 197738
6 197432
7 199530
8 196725
9 197321
10
Bargaining by artificial agents in two coalition games: a study in genetic programming for electronic commerce
199621
11 197620
12 197418
13 197416
14 200211
15 198710
16 19779
17 19838
18 19776
19 19745
20 19914

About James D. Laing

James D. Laing is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Economics and Econometrics, Safety Research, Artificial Intelligence and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 30 papers that have together received 711 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Game Theory and Applications (11 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (8 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (7 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (3 papers), Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications (2 papers), Reinforcement Learning in Robotics (2 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (2 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (138 citations), Statistics and Probability (87 citations), General Decision Sciences (17 citations), Safety Research (69 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (141 citations). James D. Laing has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Howard L. Rosenthal, David K. Hildebrand, Shelby J. Haberman, T Postelnicu, Steven O. Kimbrough, W. Richard Scott, Sanford M. Dornbusch, Andy Moffat, Robert T. Golembiewski and Charles Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Mathematical Sociology, Public Choice, American Sociological Review, Systems Research and Behavioral Science and American Political Science Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact