Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Ten Common Misunderstandings, Misconceptions, Persistent Myths and Urban Legends about Likert Scales and Likert Response Formats and their Antidotes
2007705 citationsJames Carifio, Rocco J. Perlaprofile →
Resolving the 50‐year debate around using and misusing Likert scales
2008658 citationsJames Carifio, Rocco J. PerlaMedical Educationprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of James Carifio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Carifio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Carifio more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Carifio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Carifio. The network helps show where James Carifio may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Carifio
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Carifio.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Carifio based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James Carifio. James Carifio is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Carifio, James, et al.. (2014). Assessment of a Reading Comprehension Instrument as It Relates to Cognitive Abilities as Defined by Bloom's Revised Taxonomy. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 17(1).6 indexed citations
3.
Carifio, James, et al.. (2013). Cross-Cultural Reading Comprehension Assessment in Malay and English as it Relates to the Dagostino-Carifio Model of Reading Comprehension. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
4.
Carifio, James, et al.. (2013). The Arguments and Data in Favor of Minimum Grading.. ScholarWorks@BGSU (Bowling Green State University). 25(4). 19–30.1 indexed citations
5.
Carifio, James, et al.. (2011). Minimum Grading, Maximum Learning.. Principal leadership. 11(7). 42–46.
6.
Carifio, James, et al.. (2010). Do Minimum Grading Practices Lower Academic Standards and Produce Social Promotions. Educational Horizons. 88(4). 219–230.5 indexed citations
Carifio, James & Rocco J. Perla. (2008). Resolving the 50‐year debate around using and misusing Likert scales. Medical Education. 42(12). 1150–1152.658 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Carifio, James, et al.. (2004). Mathematical Discovery: A Covariance Analysis. Academic exchange quarterly. 8(2). 115–119.2 indexed citations
11.
Carifio, James, et al.. (1999). The Effects of Exposure to Children's Literature through Read Aloud and an Inferencing Strategy on Low Reading Ability Fifth Graders' Sense of Story Structure and Reading Comprehension.. Reading improvement. 36(2). 73–89.10 indexed citations
12.
Carifio, James, et al.. (1998). The Relationship of Children's Expectations for Structure in Story to Their Knowledge of Literature and Their Reading Ability.. Reading improvement. 35(3). 98–113.4 indexed citations
13.
Carifio, James. (1994). Sensitive Data and Students' Tendencies to Give Socially Desirable Responses.. Journal of alcohol and drug education. 39(2). 74–84.28 indexed citations
14.
Carifio, James & Ramzi Nasser. (1994). Algebra Word Problems: A Review of the Theoretical Models and Related Research Literature..2 indexed citations
15.
Carifio, James, et al.. (1993). Establishing the Logical Validity of Instructional Activities for Teaching Reading Evaluatively.. Reading improvement. 31(1). 14–22.3 indexed citations
16.
Carifio, James, et al.. (1993). The Attributes of the Literate Reader in a Pluralistic Society.. Reading improvement. 31(2). 95–100.
17.
Nasser, Ramzi & James Carifio. (1993). The Effects of Cognitive Style and Piagetian Logical Reasoning on Solving a Propositional Relation Algebra Word Problem.. Ochsner Journal. 1(1). 5–5.6 indexed citations
Lanza, Marilyn Lewis & James Carifio. (1992). Further Development of Patient Assault Vignettes.. 2(1). 81–93.5 indexed citations
20.
Carifio, James, et al.. (1980). Collecting Sensitive Data Anonymously: Further Findings on the CDRGP Technique.. Journal of alcohol and drug education. 27(2). 38–70.15 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.