James Bonner

19.4k total citations · 6 hit papers
196 papers, 11.5k citations indexed

About

James Bonner is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, James Bonner has authored 196 papers receiving a total of 11.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 126 papers in Molecular Biology, 50 papers in Plant Science and 18 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in James Bonner's work include DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (36 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (30 papers) and Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (24 papers). James Bonner is often cited by papers focused on DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (36 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (30 papers) and Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (24 papers). James Bonner collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Czechia. James Bonner's co-authors include Keiji Marushige, Ru-chih C. Huang, Douglas M. Fambrough, David S. Holmes, Emil L. Smith, Sarah C. R. Elgin, Dorothy Tuan, Robert F. Murphy, D M Fambrough and Paul O. P. Ts’o and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

In The Last Decade

James Bonner

193 papers receiving 9.6k citations

Hit Papers

Hybridization of synthetic oligodeoxyribonucleotides to Φ... 1962 2026 1983 2004 1979 1966 1962 1969 1968 200 400 600

Peers

James Bonner
Comparison fields: 5 of 165
  • Molecular Biology 8.4k
  • Plant Science 2.6k
  • Genetics 1.1k
  • Oncology 959
  • Cell Biology 594
Replace D. Spackman with:
D. Spackman United States
Hans Groß Germany
V. G. Allfrey United States
A. E. Mirsky United States
Mark A. Hermodson United States
Gebhard von Jagow Germany
Roger Chalkley United States
Bernard F. Erlanger United States
Henry J. Vogel United States
Emil L. Smith United States
D. Spackman United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to James Bonner
James Bonner · 1×
Citations per year, relative to James Bonner
James Bonner · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by James Bonner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Bonner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Bonner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Bonner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Bonner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Bonner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Bonner. The network helps show where James Bonner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Bonner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Bonner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Bonner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Bonner. James Bonner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2
Fluorometric examination of the returned lunar fines from Apollo 11
3
3 19
4
Template properties of liver chromatin breakdown →
452
5 81
6 6
7 77
8 45
9 6
10 7
11 22
12 55
13 43
14 33
15 31
16 56
17 27
18 64
19 34
20 35

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026