Robert J. Foster
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 1%
- Surgery top 5%
- Pharmacology top 1%
- Molecular Biology
- Biomedical Engineering top 5%
- Co-authors
- Van C. MowMark WeidenbaumLori A. SettonCarl NiemannJames C. IatridisNathaniel P. CohenBernard A. RawlinsNoe Higinbotham
- Topics
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (8 papers)Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (5 papers)Medical Imaging and Analysis (5 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of the American Chemical SocietyJournal of Biological Chemistry
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomJapan
In The Last Decade
Robert J. Foster
52 papers receiving 2.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 964
- Surgery 912
- Pharmacology 826
- Molecular Biology 647
- Biomedical Engineering 646
Countries citing papers authored by Robert J. Foster
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert J. Foster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert J. Foster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert J. Foster more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert J. Foster
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert J. Foster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert J. Foster. The network helps show where Robert J. Foster may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert J. Foster
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert J. Foster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert J. Foster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert J. Foster. Robert J. Foster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 129 | |
| 3 | 102 | |
| 4 | 41 | |
| 5 | 253 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 240 | |
| 9 | 249 | |
| 10 | 63 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 31 | |
| 13 | 100 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | Possible role of pectinolytic enzymes and polysaccharide in pathogenesis by Cephalosporium gramineum in Wheat. | 14 |
| 16 | 61 | |
| 17 | 27 | |
| 18 | 34 | |
| 19 | 76 | |
| 20 | 15 |
About Robert J. Foster
Robert J. Foster is a scholar working on Chemical Health and Safety, Filtration and Separation and Developmental Biology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (8 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (5 papers) and Medical Imaging and Analysis (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (964 citations), Pharmacology (826 citations) and Rehabilitation (171 citations). Robert J. Foster has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Van C. Mow, Mark Weidenbaum, Lori A. Setton, Carl Niemann, James C. Iatridis, Nathaniel P. Cohen, Bernard A. Rawlins, Noe Higinbotham, Bud Etherton and Harry Ako. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Journal of Biological Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.