Jade Hooper
- Public Administration top 5%
- Safety Research top 5%
- Child Welfare and Adoption 5
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Child Abuse and Trauma 4
- Migration, Health and Trauma 2
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Child and Adolescent Health 3
- Community Health and Development 2
- Homelessness and Social Issues 2
-
- Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving 2
- Family Support in Illness 2
- Co-authors
- Lisa BuntingPaul BywatersJonathan ScourfieldBrigid DanielMartin ElliottClaire McCartanBrid FeatherstoneCalum Webb
- Journals
- International Journal for Population Data Science (3 papers)Child & Family Social Work (1 paper)Journal of Mixed Methods Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGhanaCanada
In The Last Decade
Jade Hooper
11 papers receiving 247 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Public Administration 63
- Safety Research 83
- Clinical Psychology 132
- General Health Professions 134
- Health 20
Countries citing papers authored by Jade Hooper
This map shows the geographic impact of Jade Hooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jade Hooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jade Hooper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jade Hooper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jade Hooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jade Hooper. The network helps show where Jade Hooper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 22 scholars most cited alongside Jade Hooper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 3 | Pathways to permanence for children who become looked after in Scotland | 2019 | 5 |
| 4 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 109 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 90 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 0 | |
| 10 | Identifying and understanding inequalities in child welfare intervention rates: quantitative evidence from a comparison of the four UK countries | 2017 | 2 |
| 11 | 2016 | 16 | |
| 12 | Factors that influence choice of placement for community service among occupational therapists in South Africa | 2014 | 5 |
About Jade Hooper
Jade Hooper is a scholar working on Safety Research, Public Administration, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Virology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 255 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Welfare and Adoption (5 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (3 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (2 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (2 papers), Family Support in Illness (2 papers), Community Health and Development (2 papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (63 citations), Safety Research (83 citations), Clinical Psychology (132 citations), General Health Professions (134 citations) and Health (20 citations). Jade Hooper has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ghana and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Lisa Bunting, Paul Bywaters, Jonathan Scourfield, Brigid Daniel, Martin Elliott, Claire McCartan, Brid Featherstone, Calum Webb, Geraldine Brady and Will Mason. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal for Population Data Science, Child & Family Social Work, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, Journal of Social Work and Social Policy and Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.