Jacobien M. van Peer
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 5%
- Co-authors
- Karin RoelofsMattie TopsJakob KorfPhilip SpinhovenAlbertus A. WijersDon M. TuckerJ. Gert van DijkMark Rotteveel
- Topics
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (10 papers)Stress Responses and Cortisol (7 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsPolandUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jacobien M. van Peer
21 papers receiving 603 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Social Psychology 300
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 261
- Cognitive Neuroscience 205
- Clinical Psychology 136
- Behavioral Neuroscience 131
Countries citing papers authored by Jacobien M. van Peer
This map shows the geographic impact of Jacobien M. van Peer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jacobien M. van Peer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jacobien M. van Peer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jacobien M. van Peer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jacobien M. van Peer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jacobien M. van Peer. The network helps show where Jacobien M. van Peer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jacobien M. van Peer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jacobien M. van Peer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jacobien M. van Peer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jacobien M. van Peer. Jacobien M. van Peer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 21 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 33 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 18 | |
| 14 | 41 | |
| 15 | 51 | |
| 16 | 34 | |
| 17 | 143 | |
| 18 | 72 | |
| 19 | 34 | |
| 20 | 29 |
About Jacobien M. van Peer
Jacobien M. van Peer is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 22 papers that have together received 618 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (10 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (7 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (131 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (261 citations) and Social Psychology (300 citations). Jacobien M. van Peer has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Poland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Karin Roelofs, Mattie Tops, Jakob Korf, Philip Spinhoven, Albertus A. Wijers, Don M. Tucker, J. Gert van Dijk, Mark Rotteveel, Klaus R. Scherer and K. Richard Ridderinkhof. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Psychophysiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.