Mark Rotteveel

2.8k total citations
49 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Mark Rotteveel is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Rotteveel has authored 49 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 29 papers in Social Psychology and 21 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Mark Rotteveel's work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (17 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (10 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (10 papers). Mark Rotteveel is often cited by papers focused on Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (17 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (10 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (10 papers). Mark Rotteveel collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Mexico. Mark Rotteveel's co-authors include R. Hans Phaf, Agneta H. Fischer, Jelte M. Wicherts, Karin Roelofs, Frenk van Harreveld, W. van Dijk, Ursula Heß, J. van der Pligt, Eric‐Jan Wagenmakers and René Zeelenberg and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Science, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and Journal of Experimental Psychology General.

In The Last Decade

Mark Rotteveel

46 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Rotteveel Netherlands 23 985 861 787 397 259 49 2.0k
Keise Izuma Japan 19 1.6k 1.7× 857 1.0× 562 0.7× 417 1.1× 263 1.0× 33 2.4k
Peter Mende‐Siedlecki United States 18 1.4k 1.4× 569 0.7× 990 1.3× 530 1.3× 371 1.4× 34 2.4k
Adriaan Spruyt Belgium 26 1.3k 1.3× 925 1.1× 760 1.0× 778 2.0× 493 1.9× 68 2.9k
Eric J. Vanman Australia 26 789 0.8× 991 1.2× 583 0.7× 874 2.2× 530 2.0× 72 2.5k
Johannes Hewig Germany 34 2.0k 2.0× 537 0.6× 955 1.2× 348 0.9× 566 2.2× 113 3.1k
Sarah L. Master United States 10 665 0.7× 598 0.7× 409 0.5× 326 0.8× 310 1.2× 14 1.5k
Oriel FeldmanHall United States 26 1.3k 1.3× 734 0.9× 510 0.6× 665 1.7× 295 1.1× 60 2.3k
Peter Sokol‐Hessner United States 16 1.3k 1.3× 436 0.5× 655 0.8× 322 0.8× 466 1.8× 27 2.4k
Isabelle Blanchette Canada 21 822 0.8× 541 0.6× 678 0.9× 195 0.5× 216 0.8× 92 2.0k
Max Weisbuch United States 24 516 0.5× 828 1.0× 560 0.7× 747 1.9× 258 1.0× 52 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Rotteveel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Rotteveel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Rotteveel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Rotteveel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Rotteveel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Rotteveel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Rotteveel. The network helps show where Mark Rotteveel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Rotteveel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Rotteveel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Rotteveel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Rotteveel. Mark Rotteveel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Phaf, R. Hans & Mark Rotteveel. (2023). An Audience Facilitates Facial Feedback: A Social-Context Hypothesis Reconciling Original Study and Nonreplication. Psychological Reports. 127(6). 3170–3189. 2 indexed citations
2.
Rotteveel, Mark, et al.. (2020). A mobile approach-avoidance task. Behavior Research Methods. 52(5). 2085–2097. 33 indexed citations
3.
Oosterwijk, Suzanne, Lukas Snoek, Mark Rotteveel, Lisa Feldman Barrett, & H. Steven Scholte. (2017). Shared states: using MVPA to test neural overlap between self-focused emotion imagery and other-focused emotion understanding. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 12(7). 1025–1035. 18 indexed citations
4.
Oosterwijk, Suzanne, Andries R. van der Leij, & Mark Rotteveel. (2016). Associating LIPS and SWOLLEN: delayed attentional disengagement following words in sex contexts. Cognition & Emotion. 31(6). 1197–1210. 3 indexed citations
5.
Dillen, Lotte F. van, et al.. (2016). Moral fixations: The role of moral integrity and social anxiety in the selective avoidance of social threat. Biological Psychology. 122. 51–58. 11 indexed citations
6.
Wagenmakers, Eric‐Jan, Titia F. Beek, Mark Rotteveel, et al.. (2015). Turning the hands of time again: a purely confirmatory replication study and a Bayesian analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. 6. 494–494. 32 indexed citations
7.
Rotteveel, Mark, Yaïr Pinto, Dóra Matzke, et al.. (2015). On the automatic link between affect and tendencies to approach and avoid: Chen and Bargh (1999) revisited. Frontiers in Psychology. 6. 335–335. 29 indexed citations
8.
Schneider, Iris K., Frenk van Harreveld, Mark Rotteveel, et al.. (2015). The path of ambivalence: tracing the pull of opposing evaluations using mouse trajectories. Frontiers in Psychology. 6. 996–996. 67 indexed citations
9.
Phaf, R. Hans, et al.. (2014). Approach, avoidance, and affect: a meta-analysis of approach-avoidance tendencies in manual reaction time tasks. Frontiers in Psychology. 5. 378–378. 233 indexed citations
10.
Gillebaart, Marleen, et al.. (2013). Unraveling Effects of Novelty on Creativity. Creativity Research Journal. 25(3). 280–285. 15 indexed citations
11.
Schneider, Iris K., Anita Eerland, Frenk van Harreveld, et al.. (2013). One Way and the Other. Psychological Science. 24(3). 319–325. 27 indexed citations
12.
Rotteveel, Mark, et al.. (2012). Gamma flicker elicits positive affect without awareness. Consciousness and Cognition. 22(1). 281–289. 5 indexed citations
13.
Gillebaart, Marleen, Jens Förster, & Mark Rotteveel. (2012). Mere exposure revisited: The influence of growth versus security cues on evaluations of novel and familiar stimuli.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 141(4). 699–714. 28 indexed citations
14.
Oosterwijk, Suzanne, Piotr Winkielman, Diane Pecher, et al.. (2011). Mental states inside out: Switching costs for emotional and nonemotional sentences that differ in internal and external focus. Memory & Cognition. 40(1). 93–100. 12 indexed citations
15.
Schalk, Job van der, Agneta H. Fischer, Bertjan Doosje, et al.. (2011). Convergent and divergent responses to emotional displays of ingroup and outgroup.. Emotion. 11(2). 286–298. 196 indexed citations
16.
Phaf, R. Hans & Mark Rotteveel. (2009). Looking at the bright side: The affective monitoring of direction.. Emotion. 9(5). 729–733. 16 indexed citations
17.
Roelofs, Karin, Bernet M. Elzinga, & Mark Rotteveel. (2005). The effects of stress-induced cortisol responses on approach–avoidance behavior. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 30(7). 665–677. 99 indexed citations
18.
Phaf, R. Hans & Mark Rotteveel. (2005). Affective modulation of recognition bias.. Emotion. 5(3). 309–318. 49 indexed citations
19.
Rietveld, Simon, Mark Spiering, Mark Rotteveel, & Ilja van Beest. (2004). Visual Performance of Adults with Prelingual Auditory Impairment. American annals of the deaf. 149(5). 421–427.
20.
Rotteveel, Mark & R. Hans Phaf. (2004). Loading working memory enhances affective priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 11(2). 326–331. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026