Annika Smit

766 citations
20 papers · 510 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Annika Smit

19 papers receiving 490 citations

Peers

Annika Smit
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 34
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 170
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 96
  • Social Psychology 117
  • Applied Psychology 25
Replace Pedro R. Almeida with:
Pedro R. Almeida Portugal
Kevin Fleming United States
John C. Thoresen Switzerland
David R. W. Bachhuber United States
Izabela Mocaiber Brazil
Erika Siegel United States
Silvia U. Maier Switzerland
Antao Chen China
Mingming Qi China
Thomas A. Daniel United States
Annika Smit relative to Pedro R. Almeida Portugal Pedro R. Almeida's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Pedro R. Almeida · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Annika Smit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Annika Smit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annika Smit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annika Smit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Annika Smit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annika Smit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annika Smit. The network helps show where Annika Smit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Annika Smit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Annika Smit Line = papers co-authored together Annika Smit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2003125
2 200567
3 200447
4 200037
5 201635
6 202231
7 202031
8 202225
9 202221
10 201720
11 202118
12 201714
13 202212
14 200510
15 20198
16 20203
17
Towards Sustained Team Effectiveness. In
20062
18
Vigilance; evaluation and measurement
20052
19 20061
20
The effect of sustained mental effort on vigilance
20021

About Annika Smit

Annika Smit is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Occupational Therapy and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 20 papers that have together received 510 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (5 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (5 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers), Mind wandering and attention (3 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (3 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (2 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (2 papers) and Occupational Health and Performance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (34 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (170 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (96 citations), Social Psychology (117 citations) and Applied Psychology (25 citations). Annika Smit has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include A.M.L. Coenen, Paul Eling, Maria T. E. Hopman, Berthold P. R. Gersons, Gilles van Luijtelaar, Karin Roelofs, Floris Klumpers, Reinoud Kaldewaij, Saskia B.J. Koch and Mahur M. Hashemi. Their work appears in journals such as Psychoneuroendocrinology, European journal of psychotraumatology, International Journal of Psychophysiology, Journal of Traumatic Stress and Multimedia Tools and Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact