Marieke van Rooij

1.5k total citations
28 papers, 865 citations indexed

About

Marieke van Rooij is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Marieke van Rooij has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 865 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 8 papers in Applied Psychology and 7 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in Marieke van Rooij's work include Mental Health Research Topics (7 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (7 papers) and Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (5 papers). Marieke van Rooij is often cited by papers focused on Mental Health Research Topics (7 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (7 papers) and Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (5 papers). Marieke van Rooij collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Canada. Marieke van Rooij's co-authors include Isabela Granic, John G. Holden, Srinivasan Rajaraman, Anna Lichtwarck‐Aschoff, Adam Lobel, Rutger C. M. E. Engels, Sebastian Wallot, Geoff Hollis, Guido Strunk and Fred Hasselman and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, The Journal of Economic Perspectives and Frontiers in Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Marieke van Rooij

28 papers receiving 849 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Marieke van Rooij Netherlands 15 176 174 127 122 111 28 865
Jinhyuk Kim South Korea 18 287 1.6× 126 0.7× 182 1.4× 46 0.4× 41 0.4× 62 1.0k
Michael Coccia United States 18 140 0.8× 119 0.7× 56 0.4× 42 0.3× 90 0.8× 39 1.6k
Laura Nynke van der Laan Netherlands 25 359 2.0× 366 2.1× 252 2.0× 40 0.3× 120 1.1× 49 1.9k
Ewa Tomczak Poland 8 100 0.6× 140 0.8× 24 0.2× 35 0.3× 58 0.5× 15 1.0k
Árpád Csathó Hungary 20 309 1.8× 348 2.0× 65 0.5× 99 0.8× 72 0.6× 55 1.2k
Siwei Liu United States 15 321 1.8× 221 1.3× 110 0.9× 64 0.5× 92 0.8× 45 1.0k
Martin Šmíra Czechia 4 369 2.1× 680 3.9× 86 0.7× 29 0.2× 135 1.2× 6 1.7k
Benjamin Katz United States 18 293 1.7× 437 2.5× 62 0.5× 30 0.2× 68 0.6× 52 1.0k
Ravi Selker Netherlands 9 402 2.3× 728 4.2× 99 0.8× 29 0.2× 145 1.3× 10 1.8k
Tetsuya Yamamoto Japan 16 136 0.8× 204 1.2× 31 0.2× 25 0.2× 37 0.3× 80 881

Countries citing papers authored by Marieke van Rooij

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marieke van Rooij's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marieke van Rooij with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marieke van Rooij more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marieke van Rooij

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marieke van Rooij. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marieke van Rooij. The network helps show where Marieke van Rooij may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marieke van Rooij

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marieke van Rooij. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marieke van Rooij based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marieke van Rooij. Marieke van Rooij is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Peer, Jacobien M. van, Jan C. Brammer, Marieke van Rooij, et al.. (2022). Deep-Breathing Biofeedback Trainability in a Virtual-Reality Action Game: A Single-Case Design Study With Police Trainers. Frontiers in Psychology. 13. 806163–806163. 18 indexed citations
2.
Rooij, Marieke van, et al.. (2022). Visualization, Self-Efficacy, and Locus of Control in a Virtual Reality Biofeedback Video Game for Anxiety Regulation. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking. 25(6). 360–368. 7 indexed citations
3.
Rooij, Marieke van, et al.. (2021). A randomized controlled trial assessing the efficacy of a virtual reality biofeedback video game: Anxiety outcomes and appraisal processes.. University of Twente Research Information. 2(2). 136–151. 18 indexed citations
4.
Lichtwarck‐Aschoff, Anna, et al.. (2021). From Wellbeing to Social Media and Back: A Multi-Method Approach to Assessing the Bi-Directional Relationship Between Wellbeing and Social Media Use. Frontiers in Psychology. 12. 789302–789302. 5 indexed citations
5.
Brammer, Jan C., Jacobien M. van Peer, Marieke van Rooij, et al.. (2021). Breathing Biofeedback for Police Officers in a Stressful Virtual Environment: Challenges and Opportunities. Frontiers in Psychology. 12. 586553–586553. 21 indexed citations
6.
Rooij, Marieke van, et al.. (2020). An Integrative Model for the Effectiveness of Biofeedback Interventions for Anxiety Regulation: Viewpoint. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 22(7). e14958–e14958. 41 indexed citations
7.
Lichtwarck‐Aschoff, Anna, et al.. (2020). Efficacy of a Virtual Reality Biofeedback Game (DEEP) to Reduce Anxiety and Disruptive Classroom Behavior: Single-Case Study. JMIR Mental Health. 7(3). e16066–e16066. 64 indexed citations
8.
Rooij, Marieke van, et al.. (2020). Toward improved methods in social media research.. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1(1). 24–38. 55 indexed citations
10.
Rooij, Marieke van, et al.. (2019). A Stimulated Recall Method for the Improved Assessment of Quantity and Quality of Social Media Use. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 22(1). e15529–e15529. 19 indexed citations
11.
Favela, Luis H. & Marieke van Rooij. (2018). Reasoning across continuous landscapes: A nonlinear dynamical systems theory approach to reasoning. Cognitive Systems Research. 54. 189–198. 1 indexed citations
12.
Favela, Luis H., Mary Jean Amon, & Marieke van Rooij. (2018). The incommensurability of emergence and modularity in complex systems: A comment on Wastell (2014). Theory & Psychology. 28(4). 559–567. 1 indexed citations
13.
Rooij, Marieke van & Luis H. Favela. (2016). A nonlinear dynamical systems theory perspective on dual-processing accounts of decision-making under uncertainty. Cognitive Science. 1673–1678. 1 indexed citations
14.
Rooij, Marieke van, et al.. (2016). DEEP. Radboud Repository (Radboud University). 1989–1997. 113 indexed citations
15.
Wallot, Sebastian, Marlene Skovgaard Lyby, & Marieke van Rooij. (2015). Recurrence Quantification Analysis as a General-purpose Tool for Bridging the Gap between Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis. MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society). 65–87. 3 indexed citations
16.
Holden, John G., et al.. (2014). Dyslexic and skilled reading dynamics are self-similar. Annals of Dyslexia. 64(3). 202–221. 8 indexed citations
17.
Rooij, Marieke van, et al.. (2013). A dynamical model of risky choice. Cognitive Science. 35(35). 1510–1515. 2 indexed citations
18.
Wallot, Sebastian, Geoff Hollis, & Marieke van Rooij. (2013). Connected Text Reading and Differences in Text Reading Fluency in Adult Readers. PLoS ONE. 8(8). e71914–e71914. 38 indexed citations
19.
Rooij, Marieke van, et al.. (2013). A fractal approach to dynamic inference and distribution analysis. Frontiers in Physiology. 4. 1–1. 261 indexed citations
20.
Rooij, Marieke van. (2005). Performance of Expert Judgement Methods with Expert Modelling. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026