Jacob T. Bush
- Molecular Biology
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Oncology
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Co-authors
- Christopher J. SchofieldNicholas C. O. TomkinsonEmma K. GrantDavid HouseFrancesca ZappacostaDavid J. FallonKatrin RittingerSébastien Campos
- Topics
- Click Chemistry and Applications (14 papers)Protein Degradation and Inhibitors (13 papers)Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (8 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical SocietyAngewandte Chemie International EditionNature Communications
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesIreland
In The Last Decade
Jacob T. Bush
33 papers receiving 608 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Molecular Biology 451
- Organic Chemistry 305
- Oncology 92
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 72
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 47
Countries citing papers authored by Jacob T. Bush
This map shows the geographic impact of Jacob T. Bush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jacob T. Bush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jacob T. Bush more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jacob T. Bush
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jacob T. Bush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jacob T. Bush. The network helps show where Jacob T. Bush may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jacob T. Bush
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jacob T. Bush. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jacob T. Bush based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jacob T. Bush. Jacob T. Bush is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 47 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 42 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 25 | |
| 19 | 55 | |
| 20 | 19 |
About Jacob T. Bush
Jacob T. Bush is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Oncology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 617 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Click Chemistry and Applications (14 papers), Protein Degradation and Inhibitors (13 papers) and Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (305 citations), Molecular Biology (451 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (72 citations). Jacob T. Bush has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Christopher J. Schofield, Nicholas C. O. Tomkinson, Emma K. Grant, David House, Francesca Zappacosta, David J. Fallon, Katrin Rittinger, Sébastien Campos, John A. Murphy and João Nunes. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Angewandte Chemie International Edition and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.