Celeste M. Condit

5.7k citations
133 papers · 3.9k indexed · h-index 35

Celeste M. Condit

127 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

Celeste M. Condit
Comparison fields: 5 of 152
  • Communication 705
  • Philosophy 1.1k
  • Literature and Literary Theory 732
  • Genetics 1000
  • Gender Studies 302
Replace Susan Sontag with:
Susan Sontag United States
Dorothy Nelkin United States
Andrew Smith United States
Roxanne Parrott United States
Douglas W. Maynard United States
Kwame Anthony Appiah United States
Deborah Cameron United Kingdom
Susan Bordo United States
Onora O’Neill United Kingdom
Bruno Bettelheim United States
Celeste M. Condit relative to Susan Sontag United States Susan Sontag's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.8×
Susan Sontag · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Celeste M. Condit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Celeste M. Condit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Celeste M. Condit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Celeste M. Condit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Celeste M. Condit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Celeste M. Condit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Celeste M. Condit. The network helps show where Celeste M. Condit may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Celeste M. Condit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Celeste M. Condit Line = papers co-authored together Celeste M. Condit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20198
2 20189
3 2010114
4 2009105
5 20085
6 2008144
7 200775
8 200711
9 200735
10 200435
11 200429
12 200344
13 200380
14 20012
15 200120
16 200131
17 199894
18
Kenneth Burke and Contemporary European Thought: Rhetoric in Transition
199518
19 1994107
20 19911

About Celeste M. Condit

Celeste M. Condit is a scholar working on Philosophy, Communication, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science and Genetics, having authored 133 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rhetoric and Communication Studies (48 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (33 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (24 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (20 papers), Media Studies and Communication (15 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (11 papers), Science Education and Perceptions (11 papers) and Race, Genetics, and Society (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (705 citations), Philosophy (1.1k citations), Literature and Literary Theory (732 citations), Genetics (1000 citations) and Gender Studies (302 citations). Celeste M. Condit has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John Louis Lucaites, Roxanne Parrott, Tina M. Harris, John Lynch, Cecilia Benoit, Lijiang Shen, Benjamin R. Bates, Jennifer L. Bevan, Paul Achter and Kami J. Silk. Their work appears in journals such as Quarterly Journal of Speech, Public Understanding of Science, Public Health Genomics, Genetics in Medicine and Science Communication.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026