Jack Lyle

17 papers receiving 144 citations

Peers

Jack Lyle
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Communication 70
  • Literature and Literary Theory 52
  • Gender Studies 38
  • Education 62
  • Sociology and Political Science 85
Replace Malcolm O. Sillars with:
Malcolm O. Sillars United States
James L. Golden United States
Edmund B. Lambeth United States
Virginia Nightingale Australia
Thom Huebner United States
Christo Sims United States
Lothar Mikos Denmark
Jacqueline Ryan Vickery United States
Susan Keith United States
Sandra L. Borden United States
Jack Lyle relative to Malcolm O. Sillars United States Malcolm O. Sillars's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Malcolm O. Sillars · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jack Lyle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Lyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Lyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Lyle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Lyle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Lyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Lyle. The network helps show where Jack Lyle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Jack Lyle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jack Lyle Line = papers co-authored together Jack Lyle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196288
2 196249
3 197018
4
Broadcasting in Asia and the Pacific
197813
5 196311
6 19608
7 19747
8 19615
9 19674
10 19624
11 19623
12
Television: The Uncommon Common Medium.
19772
13
Access by Local Political Candidates to Cable Television: A Report of an Experiment
19712
14 19632
15 19602
16
Communication, Media and Change
19922
17
Television in the Lives of Our Children -- the 1970s.
19721
18
Utilizing the Superintendent of Documents System Without Reclassification.
19721
19 19741
20 19641

About Jack Lyle

Jack Lyle is a scholar working on Communication, Education, Sociology and Political Science, Computer Networks and Communications and Management Information Systems, having authored 21 papers that have together received 224 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Studies and Communication (3 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (3 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers), Decision Support System Applications (1 paper), Educational Methods and Media Use (1 paper), Literacy, Media, and Education (1 paper), Comics and Graphic Narratives (1 paper) and Rhetoric and Communication Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (70 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (52 citations), Gender Studies (38 citations), Education (62 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (85 citations). Jack Lyle has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Wilbur Schramm, Edwin B. Parker, William F. Kenkel, John A. Lent, Donald Arnstine, Philip H. Coombs, C. Edward Wotring, Douglas B. McLeod, Kurt Lang and J. V. Muir. Their work appears in journals such as American Sociological Review, Journal of Communication, Communication Research, Library Resources and Technical Services and British Journal of Educational Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact