Jack Fruchtman
Impact in
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics
- Political Theory and Influence
- Political Philosophy and Ethics
- History top 5%
- European Political History Analysis
- Mormonism, Religion, and History
Papers in
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 10
- Political Theory and Influence 1
-
- Historical and Scientific Studies 1
- Co-authors
- H. T. Dickinson (1 shared paper)Ruth H. Bloch (1 shared paper)Thomas Paine (1 shared paper)Sidney Hook (1 shared paper)Ralph Lerner (1 shared paper)Barry Alan Shain (1 shared paper)Michael T. Davis (3 shared papers)Mary Thale (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of American History (3 papers)Eighteenth-Century Studies (2 papers)The American Historical Review (2 papers)Journal of the Early Republic (1 paper)The William and Mary Quarterly (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Jack Fruchtman
12 papers receiving 76 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Political Science and International Relations 84
- History 32
- Philosophy 24
- History and Philosophy of Science 9
- Religious studies 9
Countries citing papers authored by Jack Fruchtman
This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Fruchtman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Fruchtman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Fruchtman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Fruchtman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Fruchtman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Fruchtman. The network helps show where Jack Fruchtman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Jack Fruchtman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 21 | |
| 2 | 1996 | 20 | |
| 3 | 1995 | 18 | |
| 4 | 1983 | 12 | |
| 5 | Common Sense, The Rights of Man and Other Essential Writings of Thomas Paine | 2009 | 11 |
| 6 | 1981 | 11 | |
| 7 | 1998 | 7 | |
| 8 | 1988 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1995 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1973 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1994 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1995 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1984 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 0 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 0 |
About Jack Fruchtman
Jack Fruchtman is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Economics and Econometrics, General Psychology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 18 papers that have together received 123 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (10 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (1 paper), Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper), Political Theory and Influence (1 paper) and Historical and Scientific Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (84 citations), History (32 citations), Philosophy (24 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (9 citations) and Religious studies (9 citations). Jack Fruchtman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include H. T. Dickinson, Ruth H. Bloch, Thomas Paine, Sidney Hook, Ralph Lerner, Barry Alan Shain, Michael T. Davis, Mary Thale and James Epstein. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American History, Eighteenth-Century Studies, The American Historical Review, Journal of the Early Republic and The William and Mary Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.