Thomas W. Copeland
Impact in
- History top 2%
- Scottish History and National Identity
- Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
- Historical Studies of British Isles
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics
- Political Theory and Influence
Papers in
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 4
- Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East 1
- Intelligence, Security, War Strategy 1
-
- Legal Systems and Institutions 1
- Co-authors
- Carl B. Cone (1 shared paper)Robert Halsband (1 shared paper)David R. Spring (1 shared paper)David Garrick (1 shared paper)James Boswell (1 shared paper)P. S. Baker (1 shared paper)Edmund Burke (1 shared paper)J. Marshall Osborn (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (2 papers)Journal of British Studies (1 paper)The William and Mary Quarterly (1 paper)The Journal of Legal History (1 paper)The Library (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Canada
In The Last Decade
Thomas W. Copeland
7 papers receiving 96 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- History 70
- Political Science and International Relations 88
- Literature and Literary Theory 34
- History and Philosophy of Science 13
- Museology 10
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas W. Copeland
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas W. Copeland's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas W. Copeland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas W. Copeland more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas W. Copeland
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas W. Copeland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas W. Copeland. The network helps show where Thomas W. Copeland may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Thomas W. Copeland, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1959 | 91 | |
| 2 | 1967 | 56 | |
| 3 | 1960 | 42 | |
| 4 | 1959 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1962 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1963 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1995 | 1 | |
| 9 | The correspondence of James Boswell with David Garrick, Edmund Burke, and Edmond Malone | 1986 | 0 |
About Thomas W. Copeland
Thomas W. Copeland is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management, History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science and Law, having authored 9 papers that have together received 201 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers), Law in Society and Culture (1 paper), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (1 paper), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (1 paper), Intelligence, Security, War Strategy (1 paper), Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (1 paper) and Legal Systems and Institutions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (70 citations), Political Science and International Relations (88 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (34 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (13 citations) and Museology (10 citations). Thomas W. Copeland has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include Carl B. Cone, Robert Halsband, David R. Spring, David Garrick, James Boswell, P. S. Baker, Edmund Burke and J. Marshall Osborn. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of British Studies, The William and Mary Quarterly, The Journal of Legal History and The Library.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.