Jaap Daalhuizen

689 total citations
39 papers, 376 citations indexed

About

Jaap Daalhuizen is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Management of Technology and Innovation. According to data from OpenAlex, Jaap Daalhuizen has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 376 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Mechanical Engineering, 13 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 11 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation. Recurrent topics in Jaap Daalhuizen's work include Design Education and Practice (26 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (13 papers) and Product Development and Customization (9 papers). Jaap Daalhuizen is often cited by papers focused on Design Education and Practice (26 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (13 papers) and Product Development and Customization (9 papers). Jaap Daalhuizen collaborates with scholars based in Denmark, Netherlands and Germany. Jaap Daalhuizen's co-authors include Philip Cash, Oscar Person, Jan Schoormans, Stephen M. Batill, Melanie E. Kreye, Petra Badke‐Schaub, Paul Hekkert, Henri Christiaans, Martijn van Welie and Jasper van Kuijk and has published in prestigious journals such as IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Design Studies and Journal of Engineering Design.

In The Last Decade

Jaap Daalhuizen

33 papers receiving 347 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jaap Daalhuizen Denmark 12 206 94 89 83 41 39 376
Andrew Wodehouse United Kingdom 13 227 1.1× 87 0.9× 95 1.1× 64 0.8× 22 0.5× 89 504
Santosh Jagtap Sweden 13 144 0.7× 76 0.8× 73 0.8× 176 2.1× 56 1.4× 47 537
Katja Thoring Germany 10 109 0.5× 78 0.8× 88 1.0× 44 0.5× 20 0.5× 47 390
Jean-François Boujut France 11 221 1.1× 147 1.6× 53 0.6× 138 1.7× 62 1.5× 50 583
Niccolò Becattini Italy 13 240 1.2× 82 0.9× 95 1.1× 104 1.3× 31 0.8× 60 430
Stanko Škec Croatia 12 215 1.0× 126 1.3× 78 0.9× 92 1.1× 25 0.6× 70 444
C.H. Dorst Netherlands 7 244 1.2× 63 0.7× 122 1.4× 99 1.2× 14 0.3× 12 365
Charles L. Owen United States 9 195 0.9× 42 0.4× 106 1.2× 73 0.9× 39 1.0× 19 485
Jan Auernhammer United States 7 97 0.5× 36 0.4× 70 0.8× 55 0.7× 60 1.5× 14 359
Jessica Menold United States 12 325 1.6× 79 0.8× 142 1.6× 132 1.6× 19 0.5× 86 567

Countries citing papers authored by Jaap Daalhuizen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jaap Daalhuizen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jaap Daalhuizen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jaap Daalhuizen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jaap Daalhuizen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jaap Daalhuizen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jaap Daalhuizen. The network helps show where Jaap Daalhuizen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jaap Daalhuizen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jaap Daalhuizen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jaap Daalhuizen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jaap Daalhuizen. Jaap Daalhuizen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cash, Philip, et al.. (2025). Evaluating reframing in behavioural design. Journal of Engineering Design. 37(3). 920–944.
2.
Daalhuizen, Jaap, et al.. (2024). Balancing cognitive load in design work: A conceptual and narrative review. Proceedings of DRS.
3.
Daalhuizen, Jaap, et al.. (2024). Ambiguities in Preventing Infections in Nursing Homes: Care Workers Experiences and Implications for Future Policies. Journal of Aging & Social Policy. 37(1). 105–126.
4.
Carbon, Claus‐Christian, et al.. (2024). Developing design mindset: how individual and contextual factors influence the development of design mindset through method teaching. Journal of Engineering Design. 36(3). 325–354. 1 indexed citations
5.
Daalhuizen, Jaap, et al.. (2023). USING DESIGN METHODS TO EXPLORE THE CONTEXT OF COMPLEX BEHAVIORAL DESIGN PROBLEMS IN THE EARLY STAGES OF BEHAVIOURAL DESIGN. Proceedings of the Design Society. 3. 3741–3750. 2 indexed citations
6.
Daalhuizen, Jaap, et al.. (2023). THE DESIGN MINDSET INVENTORY (D-MINDSET0): A PRELIMINARY INSTRUMENT FOR MEASURING DESIGN MINDSET. Proceedings of the Design Society. 3. 3355–3364. 5 indexed citations
7.
Daalhuizen, Jaap, et al.. (2021). Defining the Behavioural Design Space. Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU). 15(1). 9 indexed citations
8.
Daalhuizen, Jaap, et al.. (2020). Delft Design Guide : Perspectives - Models - Approaches - Methods. 12 indexed citations
9.
Daalhuizen, Jaap & Jan Schoormans. (2018). Pioneering online design teaching in a mooc format : Tools for facilitating experiential learning. Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU). 12(2). 1–14. 19 indexed citations
10.
Cash, Philip, et al.. (2018). THE BEHAVIOURAL DESIGN SOLUTION SPACE: EXAMINING THE DISTRIBUTION OF IDEAS GENERATED BY EXPERT BEHAVIOURAL DESIGNERS. Proceedings of the ... International Design Conference/Design .... 15. 1981–1990. 2 indexed citations
11.
Cash, Philip, et al.. (2016). A MODEL OF DESIGNING AS THE INTERSECTION BETWEEN UNCERTAINTY PERCEPTION, INFORMATION PROCESSING, AND COEVOLUTION. Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU). 301–310. 1 indexed citations
12.
Daalhuizen, Jaap, et al.. (2014). Delft design guide : design methods Delft University of Technology faculty of industrial design engineering. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 5 indexed citations
13.
Person, Oscar, et al.. (2013). THE USE OF SYSTEMATIC AND HEURISTIC METHODS IN THE BASIC DESIGN CYCLE: A COMPARATIVE SURVEY OF STUDENTS' METHOD USAGE. Research Repository (Delft University of Technology). 190–196. 1 indexed citations
14.
Daalhuizen, Jaap, et al.. (2013). A personal matter? An investigation of students' design process experiences when using a heuristic or a systematic method. Design Studies. 35(2). 133–159. 33 indexed citations
15.
Daalhuizen, Jaap, et al.. (2012). The ambiguous role of methods in design education: Initial findings from the Delft method study. Research Repository (Delft University of Technology). 2035–2044. 2 indexed citations
16.
Daalhuizen, Jaap, et al.. (2012). FLEXIBILITY OF CHOICE AND PERCEIVED IMPACT OF USING DESIGN METHODS. Research Repository (Delft University of Technology). 1061–1070. 2 indexed citations
17.
Person, Oscar, et al.. (2012). Forming a Mindset: Design Students' Preconceptions about the Usefulness of Systematic Methods. 28–32. 1 indexed citations
18.
Daalhuizen, Jaap, et al.. (2009). COMMUNITY BASED DESIGN SUPPORT. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1 indexed citations
19.
Daalhuizen, Jaap, Petra Badke‐Schaub, & Stephen M. Batill. (2009). Dealing with Uncertainty in Design Practice: Issues for Designer-Centered Methodology. 147–158. 15 indexed citations
20.
Tromp, Nynke, et al.. (2003). Comprehending a Hand Motion Language in Shape Conceptualization. 1047–1061. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026