Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Jaak Peetre's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jaak Peetre with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jaak Peetre more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jaak Peetre. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jaak Peetre. The network helps show where Jaak Peetre may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jaak Peetre
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jaak Peetre.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jaak Peetre based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jaak Peetre. Jaak Peetre is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cobos, Fernando, Thomas Kühn, & Jaak Peetre. (2000). Remarks on symmetries of trilinear forms. EPrints Complutense Repositorio Institucional de la UCM (Universidad Complutense de Madrid). 94(4). 441–449.8 indexed citations
2.
Cobos, Fernando, Thomas Kühn, & Jaak Peetre. (2000). Extreme points of the complex binary trilinear ball. Studia Mathematica. 138(1). 81–92.9 indexed citations
Peetre, Jaak, et al.. (1994). Edgar Krahn, 1894-1961 ; a centenary volume. IOS Press eBooks.4 indexed citations
6.
Peetre, Jaak & Genkai Zhang. (1992). A weighted Plancherel formula III: the case of the hyperbolic matrix ball. Collectanea mathematica. 43(3). 273–301.13 indexed citations
Arazy, Jonathan, Stephen D. Fisher, & Jaak Peetre. (1990). Hankel operators on planar domains. Constructive Approximation. 6(2). 113–138.9 indexed citations
Janson, Svante, Jaak Peetre, & Richard Rochberg. (1987). Hankel Forms and the Fock Space. Revista Matemática Iberoamericana. 3(1). 61–138.151 indexed citations
12.
Jonsson, Alf, Hans Wallin, & Jaak Peetre. (1984). Function spaces on subsets of Rn.315 indexed citations
13.
Peetre, Jaak. (1975). On the trace of potentials. French digital mathematics library (Numdam). 2(1). 33–43.1 indexed citations
14.
Peetre, Jaak. (1971). Sur l'utilisation des suites inconditionellement sommables dans la théorie des espaces d'interpolation. Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova. 46. 173–190.33 indexed citations
15.
Peetre, Jaak. (1970). Approximation of norms. Journal of Approximation Theory. 3(3). 243–260.13 indexed citations
16.
Peetre, Jaak. (1969). Sur la transformation de Fourier des fonctions à valeurs vectorielles. Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova. 42. 15–26.53 indexed citations
Peetre, Jaak. (1961). Mixed problems for higher order elliptic equations in two variables, I. French digital mathematics library (Numdam). 15(4). 337–353.27 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.