J. Eno

1.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
9 papers, 847 citations indexed

About

J. Eno is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Hardware and Architecture and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Eno has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 847 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 5 papers in Hardware and Architecture and 4 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in J. Eno's work include Low-power high-performance VLSI design (8 papers), Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design (4 papers) and Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (3 papers). J. Eno is often cited by papers focused on Low-power high-performance VLSI design (8 papers), Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design (4 papers) and Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (3 papers). J. Eno collaborates with scholars based in United States. J. Eno's co-authors include Richard T. Witek, S. Santhanam, Andrew J. Black, J. Montanaro, M. Pearce, Stephen C. Thierauf, Elizabeth Cooper, Liam Madden, D. Dobberpuhl and D. Murray and has published in prestigious journals such as IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits and IEEE Design & Test of Computers.

In The Last Decade

J. Eno

9 papers receiving 767 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

A 160-MHz, 32-b, 0.5-W CMOS RISC microprocessor

1996 465 citations J. Montanaro, Richard T. Witek et al. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
J. Eno United States	7	638	503	261	179	42	9	847
J. Montanaro United States	7	448 0.7×	412 0.8×	241 0.9×	116 0.6×	22 0.5×	10	645
William J. Bowhill United States	7	800 1.3×	426 0.8×	169 0.6×	109 0.6×	47 1.1×	12	923
Richard T. Witek United States	6	424 0.7×	406 0.8×	248 1.0×	114 0.6×	18 0.4×	13	632
M. Pearce United States	4	414 0.6×	378 0.8×	223 0.9×	115 0.6×	16 0.4×	6	596
Stephen Kosonocky United States	21	1.2k 1.9×	429 0.9×	164 0.6×	231 1.3×	20 0.5×	56	1.3k
Nasser Kurd United States	12	797 1.2×	393 0.8×	166 0.6×	160 0.9×	17 0.4×	30	889
S. Santhanam United States	3	410 0.6×	378 0.8×	223 0.9×	112 0.6×	16 0.4×	3	586
R. Nair United States	11	947 1.5×	577 1.1×	195 0.7×	131 0.7×	28 0.7×	18	1.1k
A. Peeters Netherlands	15	606 0.9×	579 1.2×	285 1.1×	68 0.4×	126 3.0×	33	812
D. Dobberpuhl United States	5	411 0.6×	346 0.7×	193 0.7×	121 0.7×	17 0.4×	8	567

Countries citing papers authored by J. Eno

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Eno's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Eno with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Eno more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Eno

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Eno. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Eno. The network helps show where J. Eno may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Eno

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Eno. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Eno based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Eno. J. Eno is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Dietz, C., et al.. (2002). The PowerPC 603 microprocessor: a low-power design for portable applications. 307–315. 6 indexed citations

2.

Bell, James, J. Eno, Graham Joe, et al.. (2002). A 200 MHz 32 b 0.5 W CMOS RISC microprocessor. 238–239,. 14 indexed citations

3.

Montanaro, J., Richard T. Witek, Andrew J. Black, et al.. (2002). A 160 MHz 32 b 0.5 W CMOS RISC microprocessor. 214–215,. 64 indexed citations

4.

Eno, J., et al.. (2002). The PowerPC 603 microprocessor: an array built-in self test mechanism. 388–394. 20 indexed citations

5.

Eno, J., Graham Joe, R.J. Kaye, et al.. (1998). FP 15.5: A 200MHz 32b 0.5W CMOS RISC Microprocessor. 1 indexed citations

6.

Montanaro, J., Richard T. Witek, Andrew J. Black, et al.. (1997). A 160-MHz, 32-b, 0.5-W CMOS RISC microprocessor. 9(1). 49–62. 57 indexed citations

7.

Montanaro, J., Richard T. Witek, Andrew J. Black, et al.. (1996). A 160-MHz, 32-b, 0.5-W CMOS RISC microprocessor. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits. 31(11). 1703–1714. 465 indexed citations breakdown →

8.

Gerosa, G., C. Dietz, J. Alvarez, et al.. (1994). A 2.2 W, 80 MHz superscalar RISC microprocessor. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits. 29(12). 1440–1454. 181 indexed citations

9.

Gerosa, G., et al.. (1994). PowerPC 603, a microprocessor for portable computers. IEEE Design & Test of Computers. 11(4). 14–23. 39 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact